Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #46,312 of 84,120 nationally

Glenwood Hills Eviction Risk: Lower , Candler-McAfee

Tract 13089023504 · DeKalb County, GA · pop 2,882 · neighborhood within 1.4 mi

Tract 13089023504, home to 2,882 residents in the Glenwood Hills neighborhood of Candler-McAfee, scores 5.9/10 for landlord eviction risk. On the national scale it ranks #23,359 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 31% of renter households, a high level, and 7% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,365 monthly, set against $57,270 in average yearly household income, roughly 29% of income at the averages. About 43% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
3.7
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 13% Stable renters 30% Owners 57%
Tract context
Occupied units983
Renter share43.3%
SVI overall0.84
Poverty rate8.4%
Median income$57,270

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
20 th percentile
Rank, 20th percentileLowHigh
#5 of 6 tracts In Glenwood Hills
Low
Within parent city
33 th percentile
Rank, 33rd percentileLowHigh
#5 of 7 tracts In Candler-McAfee
Low
Within county
58 th percentile
Rank, 58th percentileLowHigh
#86 of 203 tracts In DeKalb County
Elevated
Within state
52 th percentile
Rank, 52nd percentileLowHigh
#1,353 of 2,791 tracts In Georgia
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across Candler-McAfee and the region

Centroid at 33.7240, -84.2721 · click any tract to drill in

Why Glenwood Hills scores 3.7

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Candler-McAfee
8.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.4
State political climate
Georgia legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
8.4% poverty · this tract
2.1
Supply constraint
$1,365 rent vs county FMR
2.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Candler-McAfee
7.3
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Candler-McAfee
7.1
Housing court bias
Inherited from Candler-McAfee
6.9

How Glenwood Hills compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Glenwood Hills risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.73.7This tracttract 023504Candler-McAfee: 3.03.0Candler-McAfeeparent cityCounty: 3.53.5Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.73.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 84

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 2,720Total filings over 8 yrs
  • 44.24%Avg annual filing rate
  • 58.4%Peak (2004)
  • 334Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2004 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 130890235042004: 482 filings (58.42/100 renter HHs)2007: 433 filings (44.27/100 renter HHs)2011: 332 filings (47.29/100 renter HHs)2012: 340 filings (48.43/100 renter HHs)2013: 267 filings (38.03/100 renter HHs)2014: 204 filings (29.06/100 renter HHs)2015: 328 filings (46.72/100 renter HHs)2016: 334 filings (41.70/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 31% over the past 8 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 1,219Total filings 2020-21
  • 16.0Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.0Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.00×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-04-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 12 filings (120.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 17 filings (170.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 9 filings (90.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 30 filings (300.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 20 filings (200.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 31 filings (310.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 14 filings (140.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 9 filings (90.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 49 filings (490.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 11 filings (110.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 39 filings (390.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 32 filings (320.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 12 filings (120.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 23 filings (230.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 18 filings (180.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 11 filings (110.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 18 filings (180.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 25 filings (250.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 27 filings (270.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 14 filings (140.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 35 filings (350.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 25 filings (250.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 175 filings (1,750.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 56 filings (560.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 14 filings (140.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 29 filings (290.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 21 filings (210.00× baseline)2023-07-01: 36 filings (360.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 20 filings (200.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 10 filings (100.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 26 filings (260.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 19 filings (190.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 20 filings (200.00× baseline)2024-02-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 12 filings (120.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 15 filings (150.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 14 filings (140.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 18 filings (180.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 10 filings (100.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 17 filings (170.00× baseline)2025-02-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2025-10-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 13 filings (130.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 53 filings (530.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 9 filings (90.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 11 filings (110.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Atlanta, GA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Glenwood Hills. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Glenwood Hills

The heaviest input here is rent-control risk at 7.3/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Candler-McAfee eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the DeKalb County average of 6.4 and above the Georgia statewide average of 5.6. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 2,720 eviction filings here over 8 tracked years, with about 44.2% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 58.4% of renter households in 2004.

The tract is predominantly Black and ranks around the 84th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 13089023504

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 13089023504?

Census tract 13089023504 in the Glenwood Hills neighborhood scores 3.7/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 13089023504?

Median gross rent is $1,365/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 31% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 13089023504?

8.4% of residents in tract 13089023504 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,882.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 13089023504?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 84th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 73th, household 73th, minority 92th, housing 82th.
Q5

Is tract 13089023504 considered part of Glenwood Hills?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 13089023504 fall within Glenwood Hills (neighborhood centroid within 1.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 13089023504?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 2,720 eviction filings across 8 validated years in tract 13089023504 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 44.24% of renter households, peaking at 58.4% in 2004. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 13089023504 struggle to pay rent?

About 19.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 12.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 13089023504 compare to Candler-McAfee overall?

Tract 13089023504 scores 3.7/10, higher than the parent city of Candler-McAfee at 3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Candler-McAfee eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Candler-McAfee

Top eight tracts in Candler-McAfee ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related