Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #32,735 of 84,120 nationally

Glenwood Hills Eviction Risk: Moderate , Candler-McAfee

Tract 13089023603 · DeKalb County, GA · pop 4,140 · neighborhood within 1.3 mi

Tract 13089023603 covers the Glenwood Hills neighborhood of Candler-McAfee in Georgia. Home to 4,140 residents, it scores 6.7/10 on landlord eviction risk. That is riskier than about 91% of US census tracts.

About 89% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 49% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,352 monthly, set against $46,618 in average yearly household income, roughly 35% of income at the averages. Renters make up 44% of occupied homes.

Risk score
4.5
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 39% Stable renters 5% Owners 56%
Tract context
Occupied units1,344
Renter share44.1%
SVI overall0.96
Poverty rate17.4%
Median income$46,618

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 6 tracts In Glenwood Hills
Very High
Within parent city
83 th percentile
Rank, 83rd percentileLowHigh
#2 of 7 tracts In Candler-McAfee
High
Within county
80 th percentile
Rank, 80th percentileLowHigh
#42 of 203 tracts In DeKalb County
High
Within state
69 th percentile
Rank, 69th percentileLowHigh
#864 of 2,791 tracts In Georgia
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Candler-McAfee and the region

Centroid at 33.7197, -84.2853 · click any tract to drill in

Why Glenwood Hills scores 4.5

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Candler-McAfee
8.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.4
State political climate
Georgia legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
17.4% poverty · this tract
4.4
Supply constraint
$1,352 rent vs county FMR
2.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Candler-McAfee
7.3
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Candler-McAfee
7.1
Housing court bias
Inherited from Candler-McAfee
6.9

How Glenwood Hills compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Glenwood Hills risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 4.54.5This tracttract 023603Candler-McAfee: 3.03.0Candler-McAfeeparent cityCounty: 3.53.5Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.73.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 96

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 2,106Total filings over 8 yrs
  • 42.75%Avg annual filing rate
  • 63.6%Peak (2013)
  • 182Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2004 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 130890236032004: 301 filings (57.33/100 renter HHs)2007: 273 filings (46.99/100 renter HHs)2011: 154 filings (24.37/100 renter HHs)2012: 190 filings (30.06/100 renter HHs)2013: 402 filings (63.61/100 renter HHs)2014: 275 filings (43.51/100 renter HHs)2015: 329 filings (52.06/100 renter HHs)2016: 182 filings (24.07/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 40% over the past 8 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 1,538Total filings 2020-21
  • 20.2Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.0Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.00×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-04-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 11 filings (110.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 14 filings (140.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 42 filings (420.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 15 filings (150.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 20 filings (200.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 18 filings (180.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 23 filings (230.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 18 filings (180.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 17 filings (170.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 25 filings (250.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 11 filings (110.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 22 filings (220.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 16 filings (160.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 19 filings (190.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 34 filings (340.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 14 filings (140.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 43 filings (430.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 27 filings (270.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 23 filings (230.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 12 filings (120.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 30 filings (300.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 10 filings (100.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 22 filings (220.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 32 filings (320.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 21 filings (210.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 32 filings (320.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 26 filings (260.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 19 filings (190.00× baseline)2023-07-01: 17 filings (170.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 25 filings (250.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 16 filings (160.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 16 filings (160.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 17 filings (170.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 12 filings (120.00× baseline)2024-02-01: 12 filings (120.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 22 filings (220.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 26 filings (260.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 16 filings (160.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 10 filings (100.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 18 filings (180.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 17 filings (170.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 22 filings (220.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 14 filings (140.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 10 filings (100.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 60 filings (600.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 27 filings (270.00× baseline)2025-02-01: 23 filings (230.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 44 filings (440.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 36 filings (360.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 53 filings (530.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 59 filings (590.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 45 filings (450.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 9 filings (90.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 21 filings (210.00× baseline)2025-10-01: 22 filings (220.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 31 filings (310.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 28 filings (280.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 43 filings (430.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 26 filings (260.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 58 filings (580.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Atlanta, GA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Glenwood Hills. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Glenwood Hills

The heaviest input here is rent-control risk at 7.3/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Candler-McAfee eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the DeKalb County average of 6.4 and above the Georgia statewide average of 5.6. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 2,106 eviction filings here over 8 tracked years, with about 42.8% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 63.6% of renter households in 2013.

In CDC survey modeling, about 24.3% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 16.7% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 13089023603

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 13089023603?

Census tract 13089023603 in the Glenwood Hills neighborhood scores 4.5/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 13089023603?

Median gross rent is $1,352/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 89% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 13089023603?

17.4% of residents in tract 13089023603 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,140.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 13089023603?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 96th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 93th, household 98th, minority 90th, housing 70th.
Q5

Is tract 13089023603 considered part of Glenwood Hills?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 13089023603 fall within Glenwood Hills (neighborhood centroid within 1.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 13089023603?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 2,106 eviction filings across 8 validated years in tract 13089023603 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 42.75% of renter households, peaking at 63.6% in 2013. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 13089023603 struggle to pay rent?

About 24.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 16.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 13089023603 compare to Candler-McAfee overall?

Tract 13089023603 scores 4.5/10, higher than the parent city of Candler-McAfee at 3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Candler-McAfee eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Candler-McAfee

Top eight tracts in Candler-McAfee ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related