Wolfs Eviction Risk: Lower , Aurora

What pushes it up most is supply constraint at 9.8/10. The voucher gap is 47.7%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears. Against Will County at 40.4%, 28% of renters here are cost-burdened.

Well under the midpoint, economic stress reads 1/10. Disability prevalence runs 18.0% against 31.5% nationally.

Running cool, rent-regulation exposure reads 2.5/10. 10% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. SNAP participation runs 6.8% against 15.2% nationally.

Against the Will County average of 4.2, this tract reads safer for landlords by 0.7 points. Nationally it ranks #57,812 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. Only 15% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.