Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #32,842 of 84,120 nationally

Black Jack Eviction Risk: Moderate

Tract 29189210807 · St. Louis County, MO · pop 4,727 · 16% of tract blocks fall in Black Jack

Census tract 29189210807 covers part of Black Jack, MO, and scores 5/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 4,727. The score leans hardest on court filing pressure at 8.5/10.

Risk score
5
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 13% Stable renters 16% Owners 71%
Tract context
Occupied units1,953
Renter share28.6%
SVI overall0.58
Poverty rate16.0%
Median income$76,746

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 3 tracts In Black Jack
Very High
Within county
80 th percentile
Rank, 80th percentileLowHigh
#49 of 236 tracts In St. Louis County
High
Within state
86 th percentile
Rank, 86th percentileLowHigh
#237 of 1,654 tracts In Missouri
High
National
61 th percentile
Rank, 61st percentileLowHigh
#32,842 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Black Jack and the region

Centroid at 38.8050, -90.2409 · click any tract to drill in

Why Black Jack scores 5

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Black Jack
8.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.2
State political climate
Missouri legislature & governorship
2.1
Economic stress
16.0% poverty · this tract
4.0
Supply constraint
$1,211 rent vs county FMR
5.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Black Jack
8.3
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Black Jack
7.3
Housing court bias
Inherited from Black Jack
7.5

How Black Jack compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Black Jack risk score vs. parent city / county / state5.0This tracttract 2108074.0Black Jackparent city4.0Countyavg tract in county3.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 58

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 700Total filings 2020-21
  • 9.1Avg monthly (observed)
  • 6.6Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 1.37×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline

Pandemic filings ran above baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Southwest Oregon, OR as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Black Jack

Running hot, local political climate reads 8.5/10. Well under the midpoint, eviction-process difficulty reads 1.6/10. 16% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.

It sits 1.0 points above the St. Louis County average of 4.0. Inability to pay a utility bill runs 18.0% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two.

SNAP participation runs 23.1% against 15.2% nationally. On the national scale it lands near the 61st percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. Social vulnerability reads 6.2/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.

Statewide the MO average is 3.8, so this tract runs 1.2 points hotter. 44% of renter households spend at least 30% of income on rent. Average gross rent is $1,211, close to the Black Jack average.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 29189210807

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 29189210807?

Census tract 29189210807 in Black Jack scores 5/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 29189210807?

Median gross rent is $1,211/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 44% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 29189210807?

16.0% of residents in tract 29189210807 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,727.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 29189210807?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 58th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 61th, household 45th, minority 86th, housing 40th.
Q5

Did eviction filings in tract 29189210807 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 1.37× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran above pre-pandemic norms. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Southwest Oregon eviction laws, OR), 2020-2021.
Q6

What share of households in tract 29189210807 struggle to pay rent?

About 22.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 18.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 29189210807 compare to Black Jack overall?

Tract 29189210807 scores 5/10, higher than the parent city of Black Jack at 4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Black Jack; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Black Jack

Top eight tracts in Black Jack ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related