Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #3,082 of 84,120 nationally

Fruit Belt Eviction Risk: High , Buffalo

Tract 36029016801 · Erie County, NY · pop 1,889 · neighborhood within 0.6 mi

Tract 36029016801 sits in the Fruit Belt area of Buffalo eviction risk, NY, carrying an eviction-risk score of 9.3/10. Population here is 1,889. Against Erie County at 44.6%, 60% of renters here are cost-burdened.

Risk score
9.3
High
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 24% Stable renters 16% Owners 60%
Tract context
Occupied units1,064
Renter share39.1%
SVI overall0.91
Poverty rate23.9%
Median income$26,886

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#8 of 8 tracts In Fruit Belt
Very Low
Within parent city
41 th percentile
Rank, 41st percentileLowHigh
#54 of 91 tracts In Buffalo
Moderate
Within county
92 th percentile
Rank, 92nd percentileLowHigh
#22 of 260 tracts In Erie County
Very High
Within state
72 th percentile
Rank, 72nd percentileLowHigh
#1,493 of 5,394 tracts In New York
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Buffalo and the region

Centroid at 42.9078, -78.8612 · click any tract to drill in

Why Fruit Belt scores 9.3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Buffalo
8.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.7
State political climate
New York legislature & governorship
7.3
Economic stress
23.9% poverty · this tract
6.0
Supply constraint
$895 rent vs county FMR
2.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Buffalo
7.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
8.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Buffalo
7.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Buffalo
7.5

How Fruit Belt compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Fruit Belt risk score vs. parent city / county / state9.3This tracttract 0168017.9Buffaloparent city6.8Countyavg tract in county7.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 91

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Fruit Belt. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Fruit Belt

The severe-burden share is 30%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. Against the Erie County average of 6.8, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 2.5 points. Set annual rent against average income of $26,886 and the ratio lands at 40%, above the conventional 30% ceiling.

The dominant input is local political climate at 8/10. On the high side, eviction-process difficulty reads 8/10. Food insecurity runs 30.9% against 17.8% nationally.

Housing insecurity runs 26.6% against 14.2% nationally. The poverty rate is 24%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest.

Running hot, rent-regulation exposure reads 7.5/10. Average gross rent is $895, 14% below the Buffalo average. This ground was mapped C ("Definitely Declining") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Buffalo. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above.

That is riskier than roughly 96% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. Social vulnerability reads 9.2/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.

Statewide the NY average is 7.7, so this tract runs 1.6 points hotter.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 36029016801

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 36029016801?

Census tract 36029016801 in the Fruit Belt neighborhood scores 9.3/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 36029016801?

Median gross rent is $895/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 60% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 36029016801?

23.9% of residents in tract 36029016801 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,889.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 36029016801?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 91th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 91th, household 72th, minority 93th, housing 83th.
Q5

Is tract 36029016801 considered part of Fruit Belt?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 36029016801 fall within Fruit Belt (neighborhood centroid within 0.6 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 36029016801 struggle to pay rent?

About 26.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 19.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 36029016801 compare to Buffalo overall?

Tract 36029016801 scores 9.3/10, higher than the parent city of Buffalo at 7.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Buffalo eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 36029016801 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Buffalo

Top eight tracts in Buffalo ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related