Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #54,273 of 84,120 nationally

Woodlake Eviction Risk: Lower , Durham

Tract 37063002022 · Durham County, NC · pop 4,601 · neighborhood within 0.3 mi

With a score of 3.7/10, tract 37063002022 in the Woodlake area of Durham, NC reads lower for landlord eviction risk. Population here is 4,601. The dominant input is court filing pressure at 9.4/10.

Risk score
3.7
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 23% Stable renters 34% Owners 43%
Tract context
Occupied units2,363
Renter share57.4%
SVI overall0.58
Poverty rate9.1%
Median income$83,080

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Woodlake
Moderate
Within parent city
42 th percentile
Rank, 42nd percentileLowHigh
#41 of 70 tracts In Durham
Moderate
Within county
40 th percentile
Rank, 40th percentileLowHigh
#41 of 68 tracts In Durham County
Moderate
Within state
47 th percentile
Rank, 47th percentileLowHigh
#1,403 of 2,660 tracts In North Carolina
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across Durham and the region

Centroid at 35.9182, -78.9230 · click any tract to drill in

Why Woodlake scores 3.7

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Durham
7.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.1
State political climate
North Carolina legislature & governorship
2.3
Economic stress
9.1% poverty · this tract
2.3
Supply constraint
$1,415 rent vs county FMR
2.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Durham
2.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Durham
6.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Durham
4.5

How Woodlake compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Woodlake risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.73.7This tracttract 002022Durham: 4.04.0Durhamparent cityCounty: 4.14.1Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.14.1Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 58

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 1,773Total filings over 11 yrs
  • 16.89%Avg annual filing rate
  • 45.1%Peak (2005)
  • 74Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2005 to 2017
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 370630020222005: 245 filings (45.06/100 renter HHs)2006: 174 filings (32.00/100 renter HHs)2009: 143 filings (26.30/100 renter HHs)2010: 152 filings (11.83/100 renter HHs)2011: 173 filings (11.72/100 renter HHs)2012: 180 filings (12.20/100 renter HHs)2013: 177 filings (11.99/100 renter HHs)2014: 172 filings (11.65/100 renter HHs)2015: 147 filings (9.96/100 renter HHs)2016: 136 filings (8.45/100 renter HHs)2017: 74 filings (4.60/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 70% over the past 11 months.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Woodlake

The severe-burden share is 19%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. Sitting well above the midpoint, regional political climate reads 8.1/10. Running cool, rent-regulation exposure reads 2/10.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 1,773 filings here across 11 tracked years. SNAP participation runs 6.8% against 15.2% nationally. Food insecurity runs 9.5% against 17.8% nationally.

The worst year on record was 2005, when 45.1% of renter households were served. In a typical year about 16.9% of renter households face a filing.

That is riskier than roughly 35% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 6.2/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.

40% of renter households spend at least 30% of income on rent.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 37063002022

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 37063002022?

Census tract 37063002022 in the Woodlake neighborhood scores 3.7/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 37063002022?

Median gross rent is $1,415/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 40% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 37063002022?

9.1% of residents in tract 37063002022 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,601.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 37063002022?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 58th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 60th, household 27th, minority 75th, housing 60th.
Q5

Is tract 37063002022 considered part of Woodlake?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 37063002022 fall within Woodlake (neighborhood centroid within 0.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 37063002022?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 1,773 eviction filings across 11 validated years in tract 37063002022 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 16.89% of renter households, peaking at 45.1% in 2005. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 37063002022 struggle to pay rent?

About 9.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 37063002022 compare to Durham overall?

Tract 37063002022 scores 3.7/10, lower than the parent city of Durham at 4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Durham eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Durham

Top eight tracts in Durham ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related