Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #10,320 of 84,120 nationally

Federal Hill Eviction Risk: Elevated , Providence

Tract 44007002500 · Providence County, RI · pop 3,117 · neighborhood within 0.7 mi

44007002500 is a census tract in the Federal Hill area of Providence, RI. It scores 7.5/10 for landlords. It is home to 3,117 residents. At $1,921 a month, rents run 36% over what the rest of Providence commands.

Risk score
7.5
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 26% Stable renters 54% Owners 20%
Tract context
Occupied units1,721
Renter share79.9%
SVI overall0.50
Poverty rate24.7%
Median income$93,914

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
25 th percentile
Rank, 25th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 5 tracts In Federal Hill
Low
Within parent city
42 th percentile
Rank, 42nd percentileLowHigh
#25 of 42 tracts In Providence
Moderate
Within county
76 th percentile
Rank, 76th percentileLowHigh
#36 of 145 tracts In Providence County
High
Within state
83 th percentile
Rank, 83rd percentileLowHigh
#43 of 247 tracts In Rhode Island
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Providence and the region

Centroid at 41.8301, -71.4282 · click any tract to drill in

Why Federal Hill scores 7.5

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Providence
7.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.1
State political climate
Rhode Island legislature & governorship
5.5
Economic stress
24.7% poverty · this tract
6.2
Supply constraint
$1,921 rent vs county FMR
6.9
Rent control risk
Inherited from Providence
5.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Providence
7.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Providence
6.5

How Federal Hill compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Federal Hill risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 7.57.5This tracttract 002500Providence: 6.66.6Providenceparent cityCounty: 5.75.7Countyavg tract in countyState: 5.35.3Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 50

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 121Total filings over 2 yrs
  • 5.64%Avg annual filing rate
  • 6.1%Peak (2016)
  • 63Filings in 2016 (latest validated)

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 356Total filings 2020-21
  • 4.6Avg monthly (observed)
  • 4.5Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 1.03×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 5 filings (0.91× baseline)2020-02-01: 2 filings (0.38× baseline)2020-03-01: 1 filings (0.20× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 4 filings (1.07× baseline)2020-07-01: 3 filings (0.60× baseline)2020-08-01: 3 filings (0.48× baseline)2020-09-01: 1 filings (0.17× baseline)2020-10-01: 1 filings (0.27× baseline)2020-11-01: 5 filings (1.43× baseline)2020-12-01: 2 filings (0.67× baseline)2021-01-01: 3 filings (0.55× baseline)2021-02-01: 3 filings (0.57× baseline)2021-03-01: 4 filings (0.80× baseline)2021-04-01: 4 filings (0.67× baseline)2021-05-01: 1 filings (0.21× baseline)2021-06-01: 1 filings (0.27× baseline)2021-07-01: 2 filings (0.40× baseline)2021-08-01: 1 filings (0.16× baseline)2021-09-01: 5 filings (0.87× baseline)2021-10-01: 4 filings (1.07× baseline)2021-11-01: 9 filings (2.57× baseline)2021-12-01: 4 filings (1.33× baseline)2022-01-01: 6 filings (1.09× baseline)2022-02-01: 2 filings (0.38× baseline)2022-03-01: 5 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 3 filings (0.50× baseline)2022-05-01: 4 filings (0.84× baseline)2022-06-01: 7 filings (1.87× baseline)2022-07-01: 4 filings (0.80× baseline)2022-08-01: 7 filings (1.12× baseline)2022-09-01: 3 filings (0.52× baseline)2022-10-01: 2 filings (0.53× baseline)2022-11-01: 10 filings (2.86× baseline)2022-12-01: 2 filings (0.67× baseline)2023-01-01: 7 filings (1.27× baseline)2023-02-01: 9 filings (1.71× baseline)2023-03-01: 8 filings (1.60× baseline)2023-04-01: 4 filings (0.67× baseline)2023-05-01: 7 filings (1.47× baseline)2023-06-01: 11 filings (2.93× baseline)2023-07-01: 2 filings (0.40× baseline)2023-08-01: 12 filings (1.92× baseline)2023-09-01: 6 filings (1.04× baseline)2023-10-01: 7 filings (1.87× baseline)2023-11-01: 4 filings (1.14× baseline)2023-12-01: 1 filings (0.33× baseline)2024-01-01: 8 filings (1.45× baseline)2024-02-01: 8 filings (1.52× baseline)2024-03-01: 5 filings (1.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 5 filings (0.83× baseline)2024-05-01: 5 filings (1.05× baseline)2024-06-01: 11 filings (2.93× baseline)2024-07-01: 4 filings (0.80× baseline)2024-08-01: 8 filings (1.28× baseline)2024-09-01: 6 filings (1.04× baseline)2024-10-01: 1 filings (0.27× baseline)2024-11-01: 1 filings (0.29× baseline)2024-12-01: 6 filings (2.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 6 filings (1.09× baseline)2025-02-01: 5 filings (0.95× baseline)2025-03-01: 6 filings (1.20× baseline)2025-04-01: 9 filings (1.50× baseline)2025-05-01: 6 filings (1.26× baseline)2025-06-01: 4 filings (1.07× baseline)2025-07-01: 5 filings (1.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 8 filings (1.28× baseline)2025-09-01: 3 filings (0.52× baseline)2025-10-01: 4 filings (1.07× baseline)2025-11-01: 3 filings (0.86× baseline)2025-12-01: 4 filings (1.33× baseline)2026-01-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran near baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Portland, OR as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Federal Hill. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Federal Hill

80% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby. around a third of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, markedly below the Providence County average of 43.2%. Against the Providence County average of 5.7, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.8 points.

What pushes it up most is court filing pressure at 7.5/10. The poverty rate is 25%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment. Severe burden reaches 15%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.

Sitting well above the midpoint, local political climate reads 7.5/10. The voucher gap is 19.0%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears.

Court records carry 121 eviction filings across 2 observed years. On the high side, tenant-organizing strength reads 7/10. Filings peaked in 2016 at 6.1% of renter households.

This ground was mapped C ("Definitely Declining") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Providence. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 44007002500

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 44007002500?

Census tract 44007002500 in the Federal Hill neighborhood scores 7.5/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 44007002500?

Median gross rent is $1,921/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 33% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 44007002500?

24.7% of residents in tract 44007002500 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,117.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 44007002500?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 50th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 41th, household 7th, minority 61th, housing 90th.
Q5

Is tract 44007002500 considered part of Federal Hill?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 44007002500 fall within Federal Hill (neighborhood centroid within 0.7 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 44007002500?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 121 eviction filings across 2 validated years in tract 44007002500 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 5.64% of renter households, peaking at 6.1% in 2016. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 44007002500 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 1.03× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings returned near baseline. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Portland, OR), 2020-2021.
Q8

What share of households in tract 44007002500 struggle to pay rent?

About 18.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 10.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q9

How does tract 44007002500 compare to Providence overall?

Tract 44007002500 scores 7.5/10, higher than the parent city of Providence at 6.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Providence eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q10

Was tract 44007002500 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Providence

Top eight tracts in Providence ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related