Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #39,308 of 84,120 nationally

Asian Trade District Eviction Risk: Moderate , Dallas

Tract 48113009701 · Dallas, TX · pop 4,919 · neighborhood within 1.0 mi

48113009701 is a census tract in the Asian Trade District area of Dallas, TX. It scores 4.6/10 for landlords. Cost burden runs roughly two in three here against 47.9% across Dallas County.

Risk score
4.6
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 21% Stable renters 12% Owners 67%
Tract context
Occupied units1,497
Renter share33.3%
SVI overall0.85
Poverty rate22.3%
Median income$78,365

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
67 th percentile
Rank, 67th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 4 tracts In Asian Trade District
Elevated
Within parent city
61 th percentile
Rank, 61st percentileLowHigh
#137 of 348 tracts In Dallas
Elevated
Within county
74 th percentile
Rank, 74th percentileLowHigh
#169 of 645 tracts In Dallas
Elevated
Within state
75 th percentile
Rank, 75th percentileLowHigh
#1,731 of 6,884 tracts In Texas
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Dallas and the region

Centroid at 32.8879, -96.8772 · click any tract to drill in

Why Asian Trade District scores 4.6

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Dallas
6.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.6
State political climate
Texas legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
22.3% poverty · this tract
5.6
Supply constraint
$1,108 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Dallas
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Dallas
4.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Dallas
3.0

How Asian Trade District compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Asian Trade District risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 4.64.6This tracttract 009701Dallas: 3.73.7Dallasparent cityCounty: 3.83.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.93.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 85

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 386Total filings over 18 yrs
  • 4.70%Avg annual filing rate
  • 21.8%Peak (2000)
  • 11Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2000 to 2017
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 481130097012000: 93 filings (21.83/100 renter HHs)2001: 72 filings (16.90/100 renter HHs)2002: 34 filings (7.98/100 renter HHs)2003: 20 filings (4.69/100 renter HHs)2004: 16 filings (3.76/100 renter HHs)2005: 9 filings (1.97/100 renter HHs)2006: 14 filings (3.06/100 renter HHs)2007: 11 filings (2.40/100 renter HHs)2008: 14 filings (3.06/100 renter HHs)2009: 7 filings (1.53/100 renter HHs)2010: 21 filings (4.53/100 renter HHs)2011: 7 filings (1.17/100 renter HHs)2012: 13 filings (2.17/100 renter HHs)2013: 25 filings (4.18/100 renter HHs)2014: 8 filings (1.34/100 renter HHs)2015: 7 filings (1.17/100 renter HHs)2016: 4 filings (0.74/100 renter HHs)2017: 11 filings (2.04/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 88% over the past 18 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 34Total filings 2020-21
  • 0.4Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.9Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.52×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 2 filings (2.99× baseline)2020-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 1 filings (3.03× baseline)2022-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 1 filings (0.60× baseline)2022-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 1 filings (1.49× baseline)2023-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 2 filings (1.50× baseline)2023-07-01: 3 filings (3.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 1 filings (0.60× baseline)2023-11-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2023-12-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2024-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 1 filings (1.49× baseline)2024-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 1 filings (0.75× baseline)2024-07-01: 2 filings (2.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 1 filings (1.49× baseline)2025-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 2 filings (2.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 2 filings (1.50× baseline)2025-07-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 2 filings (2.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-10-01: 1 filings (0.60× baseline)2025-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Dallas, TX as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Asian Trade District. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Asian Trade District

Adults with no health insurance runs 34.3% against 11.3% nationally. The main counterweight is rent-regulation exposure at 1/10.

Well under the midpoint, supply constraint reads 1/10. Running cool, state political climate reads 1.5/10.

At $1,108 a month, rents run 25% under what the rest of Dallas commands. The poverty rate is 22%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment. Court records carry 386 eviction filings across 18 observed years.

Against the Dallas County average of 3.8, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 0.8 points. Filings peaked in 2000 at 21.8% of renter households. In a typical year about 4.7% of renter households face a filing.

That is riskier than roughly 53% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 8.6/10. Rent consumes only 17% of average household income of $78,365, an unusually wide affordability cushion.

Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the most pressured.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 48113009701

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 48113009701?

Census tract 48113009701 in the Asian Trade District neighborhood scores 4.6/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 48113009701?

Median gross rent is $1,108/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 64% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 48113009701?

22.3% of residents in tract 48113009701 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,919.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 48113009701?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 85th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 96th, household 52th, minority 78th, housing 65th.
Q5

Is tract 48113009701 considered part of Asian Trade District?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 48113009701 fall within Asian Trade District (neighborhood centroid within 1.0 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 48113009701?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 386 eviction filings across 18 validated years in tract 48113009701 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 4.70% of renter households, peaking at 21.8% in 2000. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 48113009701 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.52× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings dropped sharply, likely a moratorium effect. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Dallas eviction risk, TX), 2020-2021.
Q8

How does tract 48113009701 compare to Dallas overall?

Tract 48113009701 scores 4.6/10, higher than the parent city of Dallas at 3.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Dallas eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Dallas

Top eight tracts in Dallas ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related