Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #76,223 of 84,120 nationally

North Richland Hills Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 48439113218 · Tarrant, TX · pop 2,780

Census tract 48439113218 covers North Richland Hills, home to 2,780 residents. For landlords it grades 5.8/10, a moderate reading. That is riskier than roughly 67% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 57% of renter households, a severe level, and 19% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $2,062 monthly, set against $121,333 in average yearly household income, roughly 20% of income at the averages. Renters make up 21% of occupied homes.

Risk score
1.8
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 12% Stable renters 9% Owners 79%
Tract context
Occupied units1,234
Renter share21.4%
SVI overall0.16
Poverty rate7.6%
Median income$121,333

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
23 th percentile
Rank, 23rd percentileLowHigh
#11 of 14 tracts In North Richland Hills
Low
Within county
10 th percentile
Rank, 10th percentileLowHigh
#404 of 449 tracts In Tarrant
Very Low
Within state
10 th percentile
Rank, 10th percentileLowHigh
#6,168 of 6,884 tracts In Texas
Very Low
National
9 th percentile
Rank, 9th percentileLowHigh
#76,223 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across North Richland Hills and the region

Centroid at 32.8659, -97.1952 · click any tract to drill in

Why North Richland Hills scores 1.8

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from North Richland Hills
5.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.0
State political climate
Texas legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
7.6% poverty · this tract
1.9
Supply constraint
$2,062 rent vs county FMR
7.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from North Richland Hills
6.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from North Richland Hills
7.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from North Richland Hills
4.8

How North Richland Hills compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
North Richland Hills risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 1.81.8This tracttract 113218North Richland Hil: 2.12.1North Richland Hilparent cityCounty: 3.33.3Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.93.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 16

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 49Total filings over 17 yrs
  • 3.66%Avg annual filing rate
  • 7.0%Peak (2002)
  • 1Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2001 to 2017
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 484391132182001: 4 filings (4.68/100 renter HHs)2002: 6 filings (7.03/100 renter HHs)2003: 3 filings (3.51/100 renter HHs)2004: 2 filings (2.34/100 renter HHs)2005: 2 filings (1.89/100 renter HHs)2006: 3 filings (2.84/100 renter HHs)2007: 1 filings (0.95/100 renter HHs)2008: 3 filings (2.84/100 renter HHs)2009: 4 filings (3.78/100 renter HHs)2010: 6 filings (8.33/100 renter HHs)2011: 3 filings (5.77/100 renter HHs)2012: 1 filings (1.92/100 renter HHs)2013: 4 filings (7.69/100 renter HHs)2014: 2 filings (3.85/100 renter HHs)2015: 2 filings (3.85/100 renter HHs)2016: 2 filings (0.68/100 renter HHs)2017: 1 filings (0.34/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 75% over the past 17 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 78Total filings 2020-21
  • 1.0Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.7Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 1.53×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 1 filings (2.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 1 filings (2.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 5 filings (10.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 3 filings (2.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 3 filings (6.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 3 filings (3.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 4 filings (4.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 2 filings (0.80× baseline)2022-10-01: 1 filings (2.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 2 filings (4.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 2 filings (4.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 1 filings (2.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 1 filings (0.67× baseline)2023-06-01: 6 filings (12.00× baseline)2023-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 1 filings (2.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 2 filings (4.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-02-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 4 filings (8.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 2 filings (1.33× baseline)2024-06-01: 1 filings (2.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 2 filings (4.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 2 filings (4.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 1 filings (2.00× baseline)2025-02-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 1 filings (0.67× baseline)2025-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 1 filings (0.40× baseline)2025-10-01: 2 filings (4.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran above baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Fort Worth, TX as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in North Richland Hills

The heaviest input here is tenant organizing strength at 7.5/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from North Richland Hills eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Tarrant County average of 5.1 and above the Texas statewide average of 4.9. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 16th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 49 eviction filings here over 17 tracked years, with about 3.7% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 7.0% of renter households in 2002.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 48439113218

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 48439113218?

Census tract 48439113218 in North Richland Hills scores 1.8/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 48439113218?

Median gross rent is $2,062/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 57% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 48439113218?

7.6% of residents in tract 48439113218 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,780.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 48439113218?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 16th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 17th, household 8th, minority 41th, housing 39th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 48439113218?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 49 eviction filings across 17 validated years in tract 48439113218 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 3.66% of renter households, peaking at 7.0% in 2002. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

Did eviction filings in tract 48439113218 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 1.53× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran above pre-pandemic norms. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Fort Worth eviction risk, TX), 2020-2021.
Q7

How does tract 48439113218 compare to North Richland Hills overall?

Tract 48439113218 scores 1.8/10, lower than the parent city of North Richland Hills at 2.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from North Richland Hills eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in North Richland Hills

Top eight tracts in North Richland Hills ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related