Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #68,306 of 84,120 nationally

North Richland Hills Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 48439113221 · Tarrant, TX · pop 6,853

The Moderate-tier score of 5.6/10 for census tract 48439113221 reflects conditions in North Richland Hills, Texas. It lands near the 59th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

47% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 21% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,777 monthly, set against $80,175 in average yearly household income, roughly 27% of income at the averages. About 53% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
2.4
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 25% Stable renters 28% Owners 47%
Tract context
Occupied units2,881
Renter share52.7%
SVI overall0.59
Poverty rate6.0%
Median income$80,175

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
69 th percentile
Rank, 69th percentileLowHigh
#5 of 14 tracts In North Richland Hills
Elevated
Within county
31 th percentile
Rank, 31st percentileLowHigh
#311 of 449 tracts In Tarrant
Low
Within state
19 th percentile
Rank, 19th percentileLowHigh
#5,580 of 6,884 tracts In Texas
Very Low
National
19 th percentile
Rank, 19th percentileLowHigh
#68,306 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across North Richland Hills and the region

Centroid at 32.8538, -97.2027 · click any tract to drill in

Why North Richland Hills scores 2.4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from North Richland Hills
5.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.0
State political climate
Texas legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
6.0% poverty · this tract
1.5
Supply constraint
$1,777 rent vs county FMR
5.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from North Richland Hills
6.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from North Richland Hills
7.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from North Richland Hills
4.8

How North Richland Hills compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
North Richland Hills risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 2.42.4This tracttract 113221North Richland Hil: 2.12.1North Richland Hilparent cityCounty: 3.33.3Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.93.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 59

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 914Total filings over 17 yrs
  • 7.44%Avg annual filing rate
  • 20.8%Peak (2010)
  • 43Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2001 to 2017
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 484391132212001: 29 filings (4.75/100 renter HHs)2002: 51 filings (8.36/100 renter HHs)2003: 22 filings (3.61/100 renter HHs)2004: 24 filings (3.93/100 renter HHs)2005: 29 filings (5.34/100 renter HHs)2006: 66 filings (12.15/100 renter HHs)2007: 21 filings (3.87/100 renter HHs)2008: 72 filings (13.26/100 renter HHs)2009: 109 filings (20.07/100 renter HHs)2010: 169 filings (20.76/100 renter HHs)2011: 83 filings (8.07/100 renter HHs)2012: 62 filings (6.03/100 renter HHs)2013: 46 filings (4.47/100 renter HHs)2014: 49 filings (4.77/100 renter HHs)2015: 15 filings (1.46/100 renter HHs)2016: 24 filings (2.02/100 renter HHs)2017: 43 filings (3.61/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 48% over the past 17 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 359Total filings 2020-21
  • 4.7Avg monthly (observed)
  • 4.2Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 1.11×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 3 filings (0.46× baseline)2020-02-01: 4 filings (0.89× baseline)2020-03-01: 4 filings (2.67× baseline)2020-04-01: 1 filings (0.33× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 1 filings (0.33× baseline)2020-10-01: 1 filings (0.25× baseline)2020-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 3 filings (1.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 4 filings (0.62× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 2 filings (1.33× baseline)2021-04-01: 2 filings (0.67× baseline)2021-05-01: 1 filings (0.20× baseline)2021-06-01: 2 filings (0.50× baseline)2021-07-01: 1 filings (0.12× baseline)2021-08-01: 1 filings (0.18× baseline)2021-09-01: 3 filings (1.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 6 filings (1.50× baseline)2021-11-01: 3 filings (0.55× baseline)2021-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 6 filings (0.92× baseline)2022-02-01: 5 filings (1.11× baseline)2022-03-01: 10 filings (6.67× baseline)2022-04-01: 3 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 6 filings (1.20× baseline)2022-06-01: 10 filings (2.50× baseline)2022-07-01: 9 filings (1.06× baseline)2022-08-01: 11 filings (2.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 5 filings (1.67× baseline)2022-10-01: 2 filings (0.50× baseline)2022-11-01: 6 filings (1.09× baseline)2022-12-01: 7 filings (2.33× baseline)2023-01-01: 4 filings (0.62× baseline)2023-02-01: 14 filings (3.11× baseline)2023-03-01: 7 filings (4.67× baseline)2023-04-01: 5 filings (1.67× baseline)2023-05-01: 5 filings (1.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 9 filings (2.25× baseline)2023-07-01: 11 filings (1.29× baseline)2023-08-01: 4 filings (0.73× baseline)2023-09-01: 9 filings (3.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 6 filings (1.50× baseline)2023-11-01: 3 filings (0.55× baseline)2023-12-01: 3 filings (1.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 7 filings (1.08× baseline)2024-02-01: 6 filings (1.33× baseline)2024-03-01: 4 filings (2.67× baseline)2024-04-01: 3 filings (1.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 5 filings (1.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 10 filings (2.50× baseline)2024-07-01: 4 filings (0.47× baseline)2024-08-01: 8 filings (1.45× baseline)2024-09-01: 4 filings (1.33× baseline)2024-10-01: 10 filings (2.50× baseline)2024-11-01: 7 filings (1.27× baseline)2024-12-01: 5 filings (1.67× baseline)2025-01-01: 4 filings (0.62× baseline)2025-02-01: 7 filings (1.56× baseline)2025-03-01: 5 filings (3.33× baseline)2025-04-01: 5 filings (1.67× baseline)2025-05-01: 5 filings (1.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 6 filings (1.50× baseline)2025-07-01: 9 filings (1.06× baseline)2025-08-01: 3 filings (0.55× baseline)2025-09-01: 6 filings (2.00× baseline)2025-10-01: 8 filings (2.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 2 filings (0.36× baseline)2025-12-01: 5 filings (1.67× baseline)2026-01-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran near baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Fort Worth, TX as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in North Richland Hills

What moves this score most is tenant organizing strength at 7.5/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from North Richland Hills eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Tarrant County average of 5.1 and above the Texas statewide average of 4.9. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 914 eviction filings here over 17 tracked years, with about 7.4% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 20.8% of renter households in 2010.

During 2020 and 2021, eviction filings here ran at about 1.11x the pre-COVID monthly baseline, roughly back to the pre-pandemic baseline.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 48439113221

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 48439113221?

Census tract 48439113221 in North Richland Hills scores 2.4/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 48439113221?

Median gross rent is $1,777/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 47% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 48439113221?

6.0% of residents in tract 48439113221 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 6,853.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 48439113221?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 59th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 33th, household 59th, minority 53th, housing 84th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 48439113221?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 914 eviction filings across 17 validated years in tract 48439113221 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 7.44% of renter households, peaking at 20.8% in 2010. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

Did eviction filings in tract 48439113221 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 1.11× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings returned near baseline. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Fort Worth eviction risk, TX), 2020-2021.
Q7

How does tract 48439113221 compare to North Richland Hills overall?

Tract 48439113221 scores 2.4/10, higher than the parent city of North Richland Hills at 2.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from North Richland Hills eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in North Richland Hills

Top eight tracts in North Richland Hills ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related