Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #61,757 of 84,120 nationally

North Richland Hills Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 48439113213 · Tarrant, TX · pop 4,021 · 84% of tract blocks fall in North Richland Hills

Here is how census tract 48439113213, in North Richland Hills eviction risk, looks to a landlord: a 5.8/10 eviction-risk score (Moderate tier) across a population of 4,021. On the national scale it ranks #28,010 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

About 49% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 19% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,552 a month against an average household income of $81,645 a year, roughly 23% of income at the averages. Renters make up 34% of occupied homes.

Risk score
2.8
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 17% Stable renters 18% Owners 65%
Tract context
Occupied units1,397
Renter share34.3%
SVI overall0.68
Poverty rate12.6%
Median income$81,645

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
85 th percentile
Rank, 85th percentileLowHigh
#3 of 14 tracts In North Richland Hills
High
Within county
42 th percentile
Rank, 42nd percentileLowHigh
#263 of 449 tracts In Tarrant
Moderate
Within state
28 th percentile
Rank, 28th percentileLowHigh
#4,987 of 6,884 tracts In Texas
Low
National
27 th percentile
Rank, 27th percentileLowHigh
#61,757 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across North Richland Hills and the region

Centroid at 32.8312, -97.2223 · click any tract to drill in

Why North Richland Hills scores 2.8

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from North Richland Hills
5.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.0
State political climate
Texas legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
12.6% poverty · this tract
3.1
Supply constraint
$1,552 rent vs county FMR
4.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from North Richland Hills
6.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from North Richland Hills
7.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from North Richland Hills
4.8

How North Richland Hills compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
North Richland Hills risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 2.82.8This tracttract 113213North Richland Hil: 2.12.1North Richland Hilparent cityCounty: 3.33.3Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.93.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 68

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 460Total filings over 17 yrs
  • 6.77%Avg annual filing rate
  • 21.9%Peak (2016)
  • 43Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2001 to 2017
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 484391132132001: 14 filings (2.86/100 renter HHs)2002: 14 filings (2.86/100 renter HHs)2003: 16 filings (3.27/100 renter HHs)2004: 27 filings (5.52/100 renter HHs)2005: 36 filings (7.82/100 renter HHs)2006: 30 filings (6.51/100 renter HHs)2007: 26 filings (5.64/100 renter HHs)2008: 15 filings (3.26/100 renter HHs)2009: 25 filings (5.43/100 renter HHs)2010: 16 filings (3.63/100 renter HHs)2011: 13 filings (3.26/100 renter HHs)2012: 17 filings (4.26/100 renter HHs)2013: 15 filings (3.76/100 renter HHs)2014: 41 filings (10.28/100 renter HHs)2015: 44 filings (11.03/100 renter HHs)2016: 68 filings (21.86/100 renter HHs)2017: 43 filings (13.83/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 207% over the past 17 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 391Total filings 2020-21
  • 5.1Avg monthly (observed)
  • 3.3Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 1.53×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 4 filings (0.47× baseline)2020-02-01: 5 filings (0.91× baseline)2020-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 1 filings (0.67× baseline)2020-08-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 6 filings (2.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 5 filings (0.56× baseline)2020-11-01: 1 filings (0.67× baseline)2020-12-01: 6 filings (12.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 1 filings (0.33× baseline)2021-05-01: 2 filings (1.33× baseline)2021-06-01: 1 filings (0.29× baseline)2021-07-01: 1 filings (0.67× baseline)2021-08-01: 2 filings (2.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 1 filings (0.11× baseline)2021-11-01: 3 filings (2.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 2 filings (4.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 4 filings (0.47× baseline)2022-02-01: 12 filings (2.18× baseline)2022-03-01: 1 filings (0.25× baseline)2022-04-01: 4 filings (1.33× baseline)2022-05-01: 9 filings (6.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 4 filings (1.14× baseline)2022-07-01: 9 filings (6.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 5 filings (5.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 6 filings (2.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 1 filings (0.11× baseline)2022-11-01: 10 filings (6.67× baseline)2022-12-01: 6 filings (12.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 11 filings (1.29× baseline)2023-02-01: 3 filings (0.55× baseline)2023-03-01: 4 filings (1.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 4 filings (2.67× baseline)2023-06-01: 2 filings (0.57× baseline)2023-07-01: 4 filings (2.67× baseline)2023-08-01: 7 filings (7.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 15 filings (5.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 4 filings (0.44× baseline)2023-11-01: 6 filings (4.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 2 filings (4.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 10 filings (1.18× baseline)2024-02-01: 1 filings (0.18× baseline)2024-03-01: 10 filings (2.50× baseline)2024-04-01: 14 filings (4.67× baseline)2024-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 16 filings (4.57× baseline)2024-07-01: 5 filings (3.33× baseline)2024-08-01: 4 filings (4.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 5 filings (1.67× baseline)2024-10-01: 5 filings (0.56× baseline)2024-11-01: 14 filings (9.33× baseline)2024-12-01: 6 filings (12.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 7 filings (0.82× baseline)2025-02-01: 9 filings (1.64× baseline)2025-03-01: 2 filings (0.50× baseline)2025-04-01: 8 filings (2.67× baseline)2025-05-01: 3 filings (2.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 4 filings (1.14× baseline)2025-07-01: 1 filings (0.67× baseline)2025-08-01: 4 filings (4.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 6 filings (2.00× baseline)2025-10-01: 24 filings (2.67× baseline)2025-11-01: 2 filings (1.33× baseline)2025-12-01: 10 filings (20.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 13 filings (130.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 13 filings (130.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 20 filings (200.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran above baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Fort Worth, TX as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in North Richland Hills

The heaviest input here is tenant organizing strength at 7.5/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from North Richland Hills eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Tarrant County average of 5.1 and above the Texas statewide average of 4.9. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 460 eviction filings here over 17 tracked years, with about 6.8% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 21.9% of renter households in 2016.

During 2020 and 2021, eviction filings here ran at about 1.53x the pre-COVID monthly baseline, above pre-pandemic levels.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 48439113213

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 48439113213?

Census tract 48439113213 in North Richland Hills scores 2.8/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 48439113213?

Median gross rent is $1,552/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 49% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 48439113213?

12.6% of residents in tract 48439113213 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,021.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 48439113213?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 68th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 66th, household 64th, minority 54th, housing 63th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 48439113213?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 460 eviction filings across 17 validated years in tract 48439113213 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 6.77% of renter households, peaking at 21.9% in 2016. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

Did eviction filings in tract 48439113213 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 1.53× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran above pre-pandemic norms. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Fort Worth eviction risk, TX), 2020-2021.
Q7

How does tract 48439113213 compare to North Richland Hills overall?

Tract 48439113213 scores 2.8/10, higher than the parent city of North Richland Hills at 2.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from North Richland Hills eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in North Richland Hills

Top eight tracts in North Richland Hills ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related