Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #31,049 of 84,120 nationally

Roseland Neighborhood Eviction Risk: Moderate , Dallas

Tract 48113001601 · Dallas, TX · pop 2,440 · neighborhood within 0.1 mi

With a score of 5.1/10, tract 48113001601 in the Roseland Neighborhood area of Dallas, TX reads moderate for landlord eviction risk. It is home to 2,440 residents. The severe-burden share is 34%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.

Risk score
5.1
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 45% Stable renters 53% Owners 2%
Tract context
Occupied units1,508
Renter share98.0%
SVI overall0.88
Poverty rate24.1%
Median income$49,750

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 5 tracts In Roseland Neighborhood
Very High
Within parent city
83 th percentile
Rank, 83rd percentileLowHigh
#61 of 348 tracts In Dallas
High
Within county
89 th percentile
Rank, 89th percentileLowHigh
#75 of 645 tracts In Dallas
High
Within state
92 th percentile
Rank, 92nd percentileLowHigh
#565 of 6,884 tracts In Texas
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Dallas and the region

Centroid at 32.8010, -96.7897 · click any tract to drill in

Why Roseland Neighborhood scores 5.1

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Dallas
6.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.6
State political climate
Texas legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
24.1% poverty · this tract
6.0
Supply constraint
$1,671 rent vs county FMR
3.9
Rent control risk
Inherited from Dallas
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Dallas
4.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Dallas
3.0

How Roseland Neighborhood compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Roseland Neighborhood risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 5.15.1This tracttract 001601Dallas: 3.73.7Dallasparent cityCounty: 3.83.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.93.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 88

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 979Total filings 2020-21
  • 12.7Avg monthly (observed)
  • 5.4Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 2.35×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 11 filings (2.20× baseline)2020-02-01: 19 filings (4.07× baseline)2020-03-01: 7 filings (2.10× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 2 filings (0.86× baseline)2020-07-01: 2 filings (0.16× baseline)2020-08-01: 1 filings (0.14× baseline)2020-09-01: 1 filings (0.23× baseline)2020-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 2 filings (0.67× baseline)2020-12-01: 3 filings (0.90× baseline)2021-01-01: 3 filings (0.60× baseline)2021-02-01: 2 filings (0.43× baseline)2021-03-01: 6 filings (1.80× baseline)2021-04-01: 12 filings (2.40× baseline)2021-05-01: 2 filings (0.22× baseline)2021-06-01: 2 filings (0.86× baseline)2021-07-01: 2 filings (0.16× baseline)2021-08-01: 10 filings (1.36× baseline)2021-09-01: 1 filings (0.23× baseline)2021-10-01: 13 filings (1.39× baseline)2021-11-01: 7 filings (2.33× baseline)2021-12-01: 15 filings (4.50× baseline)2022-01-01: 4 filings (0.80× baseline)2022-02-01: 6 filings (1.28× baseline)2022-03-01: 16 filings (4.80× baseline)2022-04-01: 17 filings (3.40× baseline)2022-05-01: 6 filings (0.67× baseline)2022-06-01: 7 filings (3.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 23 filings (1.82× baseline)2022-08-01: 15 filings (2.05× baseline)2022-09-01: 13 filings (3.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 11 filings (1.18× baseline)2022-11-01: 22 filings (7.33× baseline)2022-12-01: 15 filings (4.50× baseline)2023-01-01: 16 filings (3.20× baseline)2023-02-01: 15 filings (3.21× baseline)2023-03-01: 11 filings (3.30× baseline)2023-04-01: 15 filings (3.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 18 filings (2.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 8 filings (3.43× baseline)2023-07-01: 11 filings (0.87× baseline)2023-08-01: 10 filings (1.36× baseline)2023-09-01: 6 filings (1.39× baseline)2023-10-01: 8 filings (0.86× baseline)2023-11-01: 15 filings (5.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 6 filings (1.80× baseline)2024-01-01: 22 filings (4.40× baseline)2024-02-01: 32 filings (6.85× baseline)2024-03-01: 13 filings (3.90× baseline)2024-04-01: 20 filings (4.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 17 filings (1.89× baseline)2024-06-01: 41 filings (17.60× baseline)2024-07-01: 26 filings (2.05× baseline)2024-08-01: 45 filings (6.14× baseline)2024-09-01: 22 filings (5.08× baseline)2024-10-01: 31 filings (3.32× baseline)2024-11-01: 15 filings (5.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 12 filings (3.60× baseline)2025-01-01: 14 filings (2.80× baseline)2025-02-01: 12 filings (2.57× baseline)2025-03-01: 13 filings (3.90× baseline)2025-04-01: 16 filings (3.20× baseline)2025-05-01: 14 filings (1.56× baseline)2025-06-01: 14 filings (6.01× baseline)2025-07-01: 9 filings (0.71× baseline)2025-08-01: 38 filings (5.18× baseline)2025-09-01: 20 filings (4.62× baseline)2025-10-01: 26 filings (2.79× baseline)2025-11-01: 30 filings (10.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 6 filings (1.80× baseline)2026-01-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 18 filings (180.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 12 filings (120.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 16 filings (160.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran above baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Dallas, TX as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Roseland Neighborhood. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Roseland Neighborhood

This is renter territory: 98% of occupied units are tenant-occupied. The clearest offset is rent-regulation exposure at 1/10. Set annual rent against average income of $49,750 and the ratio lands at 40%, above the conventional 30% ceiling.

Well under the midpoint, state political climate reads 1.5/10. Sitting well above the midpoint, court filing pressure reads 8.4/10. The poverty rate is 24%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest.

Against the Dallas County average of 3.8, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.3 points. At $1,671 a month, rents run 14% over what the rest of Dallas commands. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground C ("Definitely Declining"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.

That is riskier than roughly 63% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 8.9/10. Statewide the TX average is 3.9, so this tract runs 1.2 points hotter.

Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the most pressured.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 48113001601

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 48113001601?

Census tract 48113001601 in the Roseland Neighborhood neighborhood scores 5.1/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 48113001601?

Median gross rent is $1,671/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 46% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 48113001601?

24.1% of residents in tract 48113001601 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,440.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 48113001601?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 88th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 98th, household 60th, minority 80th, housing 65th.
Q5

Is tract 48113001601 considered part of Roseland Neighborhood?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 48113001601 fall within Roseland Neighborhood (neighborhood centroid within 0.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6

Did eviction filings in tract 48113001601 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 2.35× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran above pre-pandemic norms. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Dallas eviction risk, TX), 2020-2021.
Q7

How does tract 48113001601 compare to Dallas overall?

Tract 48113001601 scores 5.1/10, higher than the parent city of Dallas at 3.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Dallas eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 48113001601 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Dallas

Top eight tracts in Dallas ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related