Skip to content
Richmond, Vermont eviction risk overview
City brief · 753 residents

Richmond, VT Eviction Risk: MODERATE

Chittenden County · Population 753

In 2026
Risk score
4.5
MODERATE

37th percentile, Vermont.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min2.1 Average3.3 Now4.5
5.8 2.1 1976 · score 2.3 1977 · score 2.2 1978 · score 2.1 1979 · score 2.1 1980 · score 2.2 1981 · score 2.2 1982 · score 2.3 1983 · score 2.2 1984 · score 2.1 1985 · score 2.1 1986 · score 2.1 1987 · score 2.4 1988 · score 2.4 1989 · score 2.4 1990 · score 2.5 1991 · score 2.6 1992 · score 2.8 1993 · score 2.7 1994 · score 2.7 1995 · score 2.7 1996 · score 3.0 1997 · score 3.0 1998 · score 3.0 1999 · score 3.0 2000 · score 3.0 2001 · score 3.0 2002 · score 3.0 2003 · score 2.9 2004 · score 3.1 2005 · score 3.1 2006 · score 3.1 2007 · score 3.2 2008 · score 3.9 2009 · score 4.1 2010 · score 4.1 2011 · score 4.1 2012 · score 4.1 2013 · score 4.1 2014 · score 4.1 2015 · score 4.1 2016 · score 4.1 2017 · score 4.0 2018 · score 4.0 2019 · score 4.0 2020 · score 5.6 2021 · score 5.8 2022 · score 4.9 2023 · score 4.6 2024 · score 4.5 2025 · score 4.5 2026 · score 4.5

Key metrics

Estimated values: The U.S. Census suppresses field-level data for small places. Estimated from county average, pop-weighted from real underlying ACS data.
Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 8.0 Regional 8.0 State 4.6 Economic 2.1 Supply 9.2 Rent Control 7.8 Eviction 4.0 Tenant 9.4 Housing 5.5 4.5 MODERATE
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    Dem margin +53.6% (2024)
    8.0
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    8.0
  3. State political climate
    Vermont legislature & governorship
    4.6
  4. Economic stress
    5.2% poverty · 4.4% unemp.
    2.1
  5. Supply constraint
    $1,875 average · 64.0% renters
    9.2
  6. Rent Control risk
    31.0% of income on rent
    7.8
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    90 days filing → judgment
    4.0
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    64.0% renters
    9.4
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    5.5
Geographic context

Risk heat across Richmond and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Richmond compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Chittenden County
Low
#16 of 21 cities
Rank in county, 25th percentileLowHigh
#16 of 21 cities in Chittenden County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Vermont
Low
#128 of 180 cities
Rank in state, 29th percentileLowHigh
#128 of 180 cities in Vermont for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Richmond risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Richmond: 4.54.5RichmondThis cityCounty: 5.55.5Countyavg in countyState: 5.15.1Stateavg in stateU.S.: 4.74.7U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 4.5
    / 10 · MODERATE
    The verdict

    A Moderate-tier market.

    Composite 4.5/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a sharp climb.

    50-yr trend+2.2 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steepening since 2010 · COVID inflection visible

  2. 90d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $1,875/mo. A contested eviction takes 90 days and costs $3,686–$10,242 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 64.0%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 753 residents, 64.0% rent. 31% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 5.2% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 8
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Strong-tenant coastal market.

    Local & regional political climate score 8 and 8 (Dem margin +53.6% (2024)). State climate at 4.6, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 4.6
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 4.6/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 4, housing court bias 5.5, rent-control risk 7.8. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +-1.0 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 2.1
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 2.1. Supply constraint: 9.2. The numbers behind those: 5.2% poverty, 4.4% unemployment, 31% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Richmond sits in the slow & expensive quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Lowell, MA · 198d · ~$19.9k all-in ($101/day) · score 6.1 Lowell Manchester, NH · 57d · ~$4.6k all-in ($81/day) · score 3.7 Manchester Albany, NY · 431d · ~$28.5k all-in ($66/day) · score 9.8 Albany Nashua, NH · 62d · ~$4.7k all-in ($76/day) · score 3.8 Nashua Lawrence, MA · 188d · ~$17.9k all-in ($95/day) · score 6.2 Lawrence Portland, ME · 77d · ~$5.1k all-in ($66/day) · score 5.9 Portland Schenectady, NY · 420d · ~$26.0k all-in ($62/day) · score 8.7 Schenectady Haverhill, MA · 186d · ~$22.5k all-in ($121/day) · score 5.9 Haverhill Utica, NY · 406d · ~$30.3k all-in ($75/day) · score 8.1 Utica Methuen, MA · 205d · ~$19.1k all-in ($93/day) · score 6 Methuen Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.8 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 2.8 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 3.1 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 3.4 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 7.1 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 5.7 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.7 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 7.9 Seattle Richmond
Richmond · 90d · ~$7.0k all-in ($77/day) · score 4.5 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0–4   4–7   7–10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Richmond, VT

Landlording in Richmond, Vermont, presents a manageable operating environment for documented landlords. The Eviction Risk Score is 4.5/10 (MODERATE tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Mid-tier market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Richmond is a city of 753 residents where 64.0% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 31.0% of income on rent. At an average rent of $1,875/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Richmond eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 4/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Richmond closes 90 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Richmond's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 5.5/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Richmond runs $3,686 to $10,242 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 90 days of typical timeline and $1,875/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 9.4/10 in Richmond, and the city carries meaningful rent control exposure (7.8/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Vermont, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Richmond: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a MODERATE tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Vermont's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $10,242 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Richmond

Trap · PRACTICAL TRAP
Compare Richmond to neighboring cities in Chittenden County via the grid below. The 5.1/10 score is computed from nine sub-factors plus a state-law multiplier under 9 VSA 4467. Chittenden County 2020 presidential margin: D+54.5. Cross-reference the state overview link in the guides section for Vermont statutory detail.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

What's the fastest way to get a non-paying tenant out in Richmond?

The fastest legal way is to immediately issue the 14-day pay-or-quit notice once rent is late. After those 14 days, file for ejectment. However, consider "cash for keys" as a faster, less expensive alternative to the full 90-day court process. Sometimes paying a tenant to leave is cheaper than lost rent and legal fees.

Q2

Can I evict a tenant without a lawyer in Vermont?

Yes, you can, but it's risky, especially in a state with a 90-day timeline and moderate eviction difficulty. Small procedural errors can cause significant delays and added costs. Given the typical eviction cost range of $3,686, $10,242, legal fees for an attorney can often save you money by preventing mistakes and speeding up the process. We recommend consulting an attorney after the notice period expires if the tenant hasn't moved or paid.

Q3

What are the biggest mistakes landlords make in Richmond evictions?

The biggest mistakes are improper notice delivery, not giving the full 14-day notice, failing to document everything, and trying to "self-help" evict (like changing locks or shutting off utilities). These actions are illegal and can lead to serious penalties. Also, not understanding Vermont eviction costs means many landlords are unprepared for the financial hit.

Q4

Is there rent control in Richmond, VT?

No, there is no statewide rent control in Vermont. This means you generally have the ability to set market rates and raise rents as long as you provide proper notice as outlined in your lease and state law. However, keep an eye on local discussions, as tenant advocacy can be strong (tenant-organizing-strength score is 9.4).

Q5

How long do I have to return a security deposit in Vermont?

You must return the security deposit, or an itemized list of deductions, within 14 days of the tenant vacating the property. If you fail to do so, you could be liable for double the amount wrongfully withheld.

06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 4.5/10 places Richmond in the 37th percentile of Vermont cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has risen sharply since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.