Skip to content
Crocker, Washington eviction risk overview
City brief · 1,254 residents

Crocker, WA Eviction Risk: ELEVATED

Pierce County · Population 1,254

In 2026
Risk score
6.5
ELEVATED

35th percentile, Washington.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min2.3 Average3.7 Now6.5
6.7 2.3 1976 · score 2.4 1977 · score 2.3 1978 · score 2.3 1979 · score 2.3 1980 · score 2.4 1981 · score 2.4 1982 · score 2.4 1983 · score 2.4 1984 · score 2.4 1985 · score 2.3 1986 · score 2.3 1987 · score 2.3 1988 · score 2.5 1989 · score 2.5 1990 · score 2.5 1991 · score 2.6 1992 · score 3.0 1993 · score 3.1 1994 · score 3.1 1995 · score 3.1 1996 · score 3.2 1997 · score 3.2 1998 · score 3.2 1999 · score 3.2 2000 · score 3.2 2001 · score 3.3 2002 · score 3.4 2003 · score 3.4 2004 · score 3.4 2005 · score 3.4 2006 · score 3.4 2007 · score 3.4 2008 · score 4.0 2009 · score 4.2 2010 · score 4.4 2011 · score 4.4 2012 · score 4.3 2013 · score 4.2 2014 · score 4.2 2015 · score 4.3 2016 · score 4.3 2017 · score 4.4 2018 · score 4.8 2019 · score 4.9 2020 · score 6.5 2021 · score 6.7 2022 · score 6.6 2023 · score 6.4 2024 · score 6.3 2025 · score 6.5 2026 · score 6.5

Key metrics

Estimated values: The U.S. Census suppresses field-level data for small places. Estimated from constituent census tracts, pop-weighted from real underlying ACS data.
Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 6.0 Regional 6.0 State 6.0 Economic 4.4 Supply 2.2 Rent Control 4.9 Eviction 5.5 Tenant 2.2 Housing 4.0 6.5 ELEVATED
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    Dem margin +10.8% (2024)
    6.0
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    6.0
  3. State political climate
    Washington legislature & governorship
    6.0
  4. Economic stress
    9.6% poverty · 1.6% unemp.
    4.4
  5. Supply constraint
    $1,318 average · 1.8% renters
    2.2
  6. Rent Control risk
    42.0% of income on rent
    4.9
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    144 days filing → judgment
    5.5
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    1.8% renters
    2.2
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    4.0
Geographic context

Risk heat across Crocker and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Crocker compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Pierce County
Very Low
#55 of 60 cities
Rank in county, 9th percentileLowHigh
#55 of 60 cities in Pierce County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Washington
Low
#427 of 637 cities
Rank in state, 33rd percentileLowHigh
#427 of 637 cities in Washington for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Crocker risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Crocker: 6.56.5CrockerThis cityCounty: 7.17.1Countyavg in countyState: 7.07.0Stateavg in stateU.S.: 4.74.7U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 6.5
    / 10 · ELEVATED
    The verdict

    A Elevated-tier market.

    Composite 6.5/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a sharp climb.

    50-yr trend+4.1 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steepening since 2010 · COVID inflection visible

  2. 144d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $1,318/mo. A contested eviction takes 144 days and costs $7,214–$17,859 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 1.8%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 1,254 residents, 1.8% rent. 42% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 9.6% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 6
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Mid-range climate. Not a coastal market.

    Local & regional political climate score 6 and 6 (Dem margin +10.8% (2024)). State climate at 6, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 6
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 6/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 5.5, housing court bias 4, rent-control risk 4.9. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +0.5 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 4.4
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 4.4. Supply constraint: 2.2. The numbers behind those: 9.6% poverty, 1.6% unemployment, 42% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Crocker sits in the slow & expensive quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 7.9 Seattle Tacoma, WA · 161d · ~$13.7k all-in ($85/day) · score 7.8 Tacoma Bellevue, WA · 172d · ~$15.2k all-in ($88/day) · score 7.3 Bellevue Kent, WA · 173d · ~$15.3k all-in ($89/day) · score 7.2 Kent Renton, WA · 170d · ~$14.7k all-in ($86/day) · score 7.1 Renton Federal Way, WA · 167d · ~$13.5k all-in ($81/day) · score 7.1 Federal Way Kirkland, WA · 156d · ~$14.5k all-in ($93/day) · score 7.1 Kirkland Auburn, WA · 170d · ~$13.2k all-in ($77/day) · score 7 Auburn Redmond, WA · 147d · ~$14.6k all-in ($99/day) · score 6.7 Redmond South Hill, WA · 159d · ~$14.2k all-in ($89/day) · score 6.9 South Hill Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.8 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 2.8 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 3.1 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 3.4 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 7.1 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 5.7 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.7 New York Crocker
Crocker · 144d · ~$12.5k all-in ($87/day) · score 6.5 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0–4   4–7   7–10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Crocker, WA

Landlording in Crocker, Washington, presents an elevated-friction market where documented notices and proactive screening matter. The Eviction Risk Score is 6.5/10 (ELEVATED tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Elevated-friction market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Crocker is a city of 1,254 residents where 1.8% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 42.0% of income on rent. At an average rent of $1,318/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Crocker eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 5.5/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Crocker closes 144 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Crocker's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 4/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Crocker runs $7,214 to $17,859 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 144 days of typical timeline and $1,318/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 2.2/10 in Crocker, and the city has limited rent control exposure (4.9/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Washington, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Crocker: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a ELEVATED tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Washington's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $17,859 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Crocker

Trap · WASHINGTON
Pierce County court applies Washington statute uniformly. Filing fee, notice period, and trial-to-writ timeline are set at the state level. At 4.6/10 local risk, default judgment frequency is typical.
04Eviction filings

Live filings tracking · Eviction Lab

Princeton Eviction Lab Tracking System, county-level. Last update 2026-05-01.

In the most recent month, 328 eviction cases were filed across the tracker's coverage area, 1.40× the historical baseline (above baseline). Past 12 months: 3,573 filings. Pandemic-era cumulative: 13,911.

  • 328Past month
  • 3,573Past 12 months
  • 1.40×vs baseline (past mo)
  • 10.6%Repeat-tenant filings
Notice requirement: at least 14 days notice. Filing fee: $250 filing fee.
Last 36 months of filings 2023-05-01 – 2026-04-01
Monthly eviction filings (Eviction Lab tracker)2023-05-01: 206 filings (0.77× hist)2023-06-01: 238 filings (0.84× hist)2023-07-01: 275 filings (0.94× hist)2023-08-01: 301 filings (1.01× hist)2023-09-01: 251 filings (0.91× hist)2023-10-01: 306 filings (0.96× hist)2023-11-01: 288 filings (1.05× hist)2023-12-01: 269 filings (1.08× hist)2024-01-01: 273 filings (1.40× hist)2024-02-01: 289 filings (1.25× hist)2024-03-01: 301 filings (1.12× hist)2024-04-01: 265 filings (1.13× hist)2024-05-01: 328 filings (1.23× hist)2024-06-01: 329 filings (1.16× hist)2024-07-01: 310 filings (1.06× hist)2024-08-01: 293 filings (0.99× hist)2024-09-01: 300 filings (1.09× hist)2024-10-01: 332 filings (1.04× hist)2024-11-01: 262 filings (0.95× hist)2024-12-01: 231 filings (0.92× hist)2025-01-01: 332 filings (1.70× hist)2025-02-01: 284 filings (1.28× hist)2025-03-01: 325 filings (1.20× hist)2025-04-01: 247 filings (1.06× hist)2025-05-01: 294 filings (1.10× hist)2025-06-01: 268 filings (0.95× hist)2025-07-01: 319 filings (1.09× hist)2025-08-01: 291 filings (0.98× hist)2025-09-01: 241 filings (0.88× hist)2025-10-01: 289 filings (0.91× hist)2025-11-01: 237 filings (0.86× hist)2025-12-01: 351 filings (1.40× hist)2026-01-01: 353 filings (1.81× hist)2026-02-01: 274 filings (1.23× hist)2026-03-01: 328 filings (1.22× hist)2026-04-01: 328 filings (1.40× hist)
Filings climbed 12% over the past 12 months.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

What's the fastest I can evict a tenant in Crocker, WA?

Even with a non-paying tenant, the absolute fastest you can likely complete an eviction in Crocker, WA is around 2-3 months, but the typical timeline is 144 days. The 14-day notice period is just the start. After that, you're looking at court filing, service, hearings, and potentially a sheriff lockout. There are no shortcuts.
Q2

Can I charge a late fee in Crocker?

Yes, you can charge a late fee in Crocker, but it must be reasonable and stated clearly in your lease agreement. Washington law doesn't specify a maximum amount, but courts will scrutinize excessive fees. A common rule of thumb is 5-10% of the monthly rent. Don't try to make a profit off late fees; they should only cover your administrative costs.
Q3

Do I need an attorney for an eviction in Washington state?

While you can technically represent yourself in an unlawful detainer action in Washington, it is strongly advised to hire an attorney. The process is legally complex, and even minor errors in paperwork or procedure can lead to delays or dismissal, costing you more in the long run. Given the typical 144-day timeline and high costs, a good attorney is an investment.
Q4

What if my tenant claims their income source is protected?

Washington state has statewide source-of-income protection. This means you cannot refuse to rent to someone solely because they use a housing voucher, disability benefits, or other legal forms of income. You must evaluate them based on the same objective criteria (credit, rental history, etc.) as any other applicant. Failing to do so can lead to a discrimination complaint.
Q5

Can I just change the locks if a tenant stops paying rent?

Absolutely not. Changing locks, shutting off utilities, or removing a tenant's belongings without a court order is illegal in Washington state and can result in severe penalties, including fines and damages owed to the tenant. This is considered a "self-help" eviction and is strictly prohibited under RCW § 59.18.290. Always follow the legal eviction process.
06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 6.5/10 places Crocker in the 35th percentile of Washington cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has risen sharply since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.