Skip to content
Brownsville, Wisconsin eviction risk overview
City brief · 595 residents

Brownsville, WI Eviction Risk: LOW

Fond du Lac County · Population 595

In 2026
Risk score
3.6
LOW

69th percentile, Wisconsin.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

Has Brownsville been getting tougher on landlords? 1976 to 2026

Min3.1 Average3.6 Now3.6
4.6 3.1
Operator read

Market shape first: supply constraint scores 6.2/10, so units re-let quickly and vacancy is a smaller lever here. The legal overlay adds courts that follow the statute (3.7/10) make outcomes predictable. Against #4 of 14 in the county that nets out to 3.6/10, Low, with the balance set more by economics than by statute.

What do renters in Brownsville earn, and what are they paying?

Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

What is actually driving the Brownsville score?

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 4.3 Regional 4.3 State 2.9 Economic 5.5 Supply 6.2 Rent Control 4.6 Eviction 3.2 Tenant 5.6 Housing 3.7 3.6 LOW
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    GOP margin +28.7% (2024)
    4.3
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    4.3
  3. State political climate
    Wisconsin legislature & governorship
    2.9
  4. Economic stress
    4.2% poverty · 7.6% unemp.
    5.5
  5. Supply constraint
    $1,101 average · 26.9% renters
    6.2
  6. Rent Control risk
    26.6% of income on rent
    4.6
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    52 days filing → judgment
    3.2
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    26.9% renters
    5.6
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    3.7
Geographic context

Risk heat across Brownsville and the region

Click any city to see its score

Where does Brownsville sit in the county pecking order?

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Fond du Lac County
High
#4 of 14 cities
Rank in county, 77th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 14 cities in Fond du Lac County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Wisconsin
Elevated
#253 of 803 cities
Rank in state, 69th percentileLowHigh
#253 of 803 cities in Wisconsin for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Brownsville risk score vs. county / state / U.S.3.6BrownsvilleThis city3.9Countyavg in county3.9Stateavg in state5.1U.S.national avg

Wisconsin landlord-tenant law

Eviction rules are set at the state level. These are the Wisconsin statutes, timelines and dollar figures that govern every property on this page.

Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 3.6
    / 10 · LOW
    The verdict

    A Low-tier market.

    Composite 3.6/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a slow, steady climb.

    50-yr trend+0.5 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steady ratchet · no large swings

  2. 52d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $1,101/mo. A contested eviction takes 52 days and costs $1,881–$5,566 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026
  3. 26.9%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 595 residents, 26.9% rent. 27% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 4.2% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026
  4. 4.3
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Mid-range climate. Not a coastal market.

    Local & regional political climate score 4.3 and 4.3 (GOP margin +28.7% (2024)). State climate at 2.9, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 2.9
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 2.9/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 3.2, housing court bias 3.7, rent-control risk 4.6. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +-1.8 since '00
    197620012026
  6. 5.5
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 5.5. Supply constraint: 6.2. The numbers behind those: 4.2% poverty, 7.6% unemployment, 27% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Brownsville sits in the quick & cheap quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Milwaukee, WI · 49d · ~$3.2k all-in ($66/day) · score 4.4 Milwaukee Appleton, WI · 48d · ~$3.6k all-in ($75/day) · score 3.7 Appleton Waukesha, WI · 54d · ~$3.8k all-in ($70/day) · score 4 Waukesha Oshkosh, WI · 47d · ~$3.5k all-in ($74/day) · score 4 Oshkosh West Allis, WI · 50d · ~$3.6k all-in ($71/day) · score 4.1 West Allis Madison, WI · 45d · ~$3.3k all-in ($73/day) · score 4.6 Madison Green Bay, WI · 51d · ~$3.2k all-in ($64/day) · score 3.4 Green Bay Kenosha, WI · 53d · ~$3.5k all-in ($66/day) · score 3.6 Kenosha Racine, WI · 51d · ~$3.5k all-in ($69/day) · score 3.6 Racine Eau Claire, WI · 47d · ~$3.3k all-in ($71/day) · score 4 Eau Claire Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 3.7 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 3.6 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 4 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 4.3 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 8.1 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 6.7 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.6 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 7.9 Seattle Brownsville
Brownsville · 52d · ~$3.7k all-in ($72/day) · score 3.6 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0–4   4–7   7–10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Brownsville, WI

Landlording in Brownsville, Wisconsin, presents a manageable operating environment for documented landlords. The Eviction Risk Score is 3.6/10 (LOW tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Mid-tier market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Brownsville is a city of 595 residents where 26.9% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 26.6% of income on rent. At an average rent of $1,101/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Brownsville eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 3.2/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Brownsville closes 52 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Brownsville's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 3.7/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Brownsville runs $1,881 to $5,566 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 52 days of typical timeline and $1,101/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 5.6/10 in Brownsville, and the city has limited rent control exposure (4.6/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Wisconsin, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Brownsville: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a LOW tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Wisconsin's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $5,566 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Brownsville

Trap · PRACTICAL TRAP
Comparative benchmarking matters in markets like this. Brownsville's 3.6/10 is below the Wisconsin state average. Rent-control-risk sub-score: 4.6/10. See the nearby cities grid below for direct A-vs-B comparison.
04Eviction filings

Live filings tracking · Eviction Lab

Princeton Eviction Lab Tracking System, state-level (no county tracker available). Last update 2026-05-01.

In the most recent month, 1,980 eviction cases were filed across the tracker's coverage area, 0.90× the historical baseline (below baseline). Past 12 months: 25,794 filings. Pandemic-era cumulative: 145,103.

  • 1,980Past month
  • 25,794Past 12 months
  • 0.90×vs baseline (past mo)
  • 15.2%Repeat-tenant filings
Notice requirement: at least five days notice (in some cases more). Filing fee: $94.50 filing fee.
Last 36 months of filings 2023-05-01 – 2026-04-01
Monthly eviction filings (Eviction Lab tracker)
Filings dropped 7% over the past 12 months.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

What's the best way to handle a tenant who pays late consistently but eventually pays?

Issue a pay-or-quit notice every time rent is late, even if you expect them to pay. This creates a paper trail and reinforces the lease terms. If they continue, consider not renewing their lease. Consistent late payments signal potential future problems and can strain your cash flow.

Q2

Can I increase the security deposit after a tenant moves in?

Generally, no, unless specifically allowed by your lease agreement for a valid reason (e.g., adding a pet). It's best practice to set the security deposit at the beginning of the tenancy and stick to it. Wisconsin doesn't cap deposits, but transparency is important.

Q3

What if a tenant abandons the property?

If you reasonably believe the tenant has abandoned the property, you can generally take possession. However, you must follow specific legal procedures to avoid an illegal eviction. This often involves sending a notice of abandonment and waiting a specified period. When in doubt, consult an attorney.

Q4

Do I need a lawyer for every eviction?

Not always, especially for straightforward non-payment cases where the tenant doesn't contest. However, if the tenant files an answer, raises defenses, or if the situation is complex (e.g., lease violations, property damage), hiring an attorney is highly recommended. It can save you time, stress, and money in the long run.

06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 3.6/10 places Brownsville in the 69th percentile of Wisconsin cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has climbed steadily since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.