Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #29,336 of 84,120 nationally

Keeling Eviction Risk: Moderate , Tucson

Tract 04019001304 · Pima, AZ · pop 5,034 · neighborhood within 0.3 mi

04019001304 is a census tract in the Keeling area of Tucson, AZ. It scores 5.2/10 for landlords. 65% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, far above the Pima County average of 43.8%.

Risk score
5.2
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 46% Stable renters 25% Owners 29%
Tract context
Occupied units2,435
Renter share71.2%
SVI overall0.93
Poverty rate31.9%
Median income$33,172

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2 tracts In Keeling
Very High
Within parent city
78 th percentile
Rank, 78th percentileLowHigh
#33 of 143 tracts In Tucson
High
Within county
86 th percentile
Rank, 86th percentileLowHigh
#39 of 270 tracts In Pima
High
Within state
96 th percentile
Rank, 96th percentileLowHigh
#72 of 1,765 tracts In Arizona
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Tucson and the region

Centroid at 32.2559, -110.9709 · click any tract to drill in

Why Keeling scores 5.2

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Tucson
7.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.9
State political climate
Arizona legislature & governorship
2.2
Economic stress
31.9% poverty · this tract
8.0
Supply constraint
$855 rent vs county FMR
1.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Tucson
1.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Tucson
5.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Tucson
4.5

How Keeling compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Keeling risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 5.25.2This tracttract 001304Tucson: 3.83.8Tucsonparent cityCounty: 3.93.9Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.83.8Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 93

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 2,372Total filings over 12 yrs
  • 12.82%Avg annual filing rate
  • 21.6%Peak (2008)
  • 142Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2004 to 2017
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 040190013042004: 209 filings (13.69/100 renter HHs)2005: 218 filings (15.72/100 renter HHs)2006: 233 filings (16.80/100 renter HHs)2007: 178 filings (12.84/100 renter HHs)2008: 299 filings (21.56/100 renter HHs)2009: 151 filings (10.89/100 renter HHs)2010: 148 filings (8.59/100 renter HHs)2011: 192 filings (11.14/100 renter HHs)2012: 212 filings (12.30/100 renter HHs)2013: 212 filings (12.30/100 renter HHs)2016: 178 filings (10.05/100 renter HHs)2017: 142 filings (8.01/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 32% over the past 12 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Keeling. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Keeling

29% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. The clearest offset is supply constraint at 1.2/10. The poverty rate is 32%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment.

Well under the midpoint, rent-regulation exposure reads 1.5/10. This is renter territory: 71% of occupied units are tenant-occupied.

On the high side, court filing pressure reads 8.4/10. Average gross rent is $855, 25% below the Tucson average. Food insecurity runs 29.8% against 17.8% nationally.

Against the Pima County average of 3.9, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.3 points. Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 2,372 filings here across 12 tracked years. Inability to pay a utility bill runs 15.3% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two.

The worst year on record was 2008, when 21.6% of renter households were served. In a typical year about 12.8% of renter households face a filing.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 04019001304

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 04019001304?

Census tract 04019001304 in the Keeling neighborhood scores 5.2/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 04019001304?

Median gross rent is $855/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 65% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 04019001304?

31.9% of residents in tract 04019001304 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,034.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 04019001304?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 93th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 97th, household 61th, minority 79th, housing 89th.
Q5

Is tract 04019001304 considered part of Keeling?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 04019001304 fall within Keeling (neighborhood centroid within 0.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 04019001304?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 2,372 eviction filings across 12 validated years in tract 04019001304 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 12.82% of renter households, peaking at 21.6% in 2008. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 04019001304 struggle to pay rent?

About 20.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 15.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 04019001304 compare to Tucson overall?

Tract 04019001304 scores 5.2/10, higher than the parent city of Tucson at 3.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Tucson eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Tucson

Top eight tracts in Tucson ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related