San Tan Valley Eviction Risk: Lower

Well under the midpoint, state political climate reads 2.2/10. Sitting well above the midpoint, court filing pressure reads 7.4/10. SNAP participation runs 6.1% against 15.2% nationally.

Against Pinal County at 37.6%, 33% of renters here are cost-burdened. Severe burden reaches 10%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.

Against the Pinal County average of 3.8, this tract reads safer for landlords by 0.8 points. Food insecurity runs 10.3% against 17.8% nationally.

At $1,900 a month, rents run 9% under what the rest of San Tan Valley commands. That is riskier than roughly 20% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. Only 10% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices.

Social vulnerability reads 3.2/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the least pressured.

Poverty sits at 5%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap. Annual rent works out to 21% of average household income of $106,685.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.