2 census tracts · pop 7,374 · pop-weighted Eviction Risk Score 3.2/10
· range 3–3.3
Los Alamos takes in 2 census tracts of San Luis, AZ, population 7,374. The Eviction Risk Score is 3.2/10, in the Lower tier. 33.8% of adults carry no health insurance against 11.3% nationally, a common route into sudden unpayable debt.
At $1,021 a month, rents sit 38% over what the rest of San Luis commands. Against a San Luis baseline of 19.9%, 32% of renters here cross the 30%-of-income line.
Food insecurity affects 36.3% of adults, 18.5 points above the national rate. Pulling the other way is eviction-process difficulty, at 2.2/10. Running cool is economic stress, at 2.7/10.
On the softer side is rent-regulation exposure, at 2.8/10. That places it #5 of 5 neighborhoods in San Luis.
The closest comparables inside the same city are Los Olivos and San Luis Townsite. Social vulnerability runs high at 8.4/10, concentrating the disaster- and displacement-exposure this model treats as a lagging risk input. Against average income of $63,489, annual rent is only 19%, a wide affordability cushion.
The 2 tracts here are tightly clustered, 0.3 points apart at the extremes. 29% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
The area figure travels well to individual addresses here, though the per-tract table below still carries the detail. Scores move when the ACS release, the court-record feed, or the statute ledger behind them moves.
Risk score
3.2
Lower
2 tracts · population-weighted
Los Alamos vs San LuisHow this neighborhood stacks against the citywide average
Single-parent HH, disability, language barriers, age 17- / 65+
Racial/ethnic minority99%ile
Hispanic + non-white share of population
Housing & transport42%ile
Multi-unit structures, mobile homes, crowding, no vehicle
CDC PLACES 2023 · pop-weighted
Eviction-adjacent indicators in Los Alamos
Average across all constituent tracts, population-weighted. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh) crude prevalence.
27.0%Housing insecurity
14.5%Utility shutoff threat
35.5%Food insecurity
25.1%SNAP enrollment
33.0%No health insurance
36.2%Any disability
Frequently asked
About Los Alamos
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for Los Alamos?
Los Alamos scores 3.2/10 (Lower tier) across 2 census tracts. The pop-weighted Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income and poverty signals.
Q2
How does Los Alamos compare to San Luis overall?
Los Alamos scores 0.5 points lower than San Luis overall (3.7/10). Renters spend 32% of income on rent vs 20% citywide. Average rent: $1,021 vs $741.
Q3
What is the average rent in Los Alamos?
Average gross rent in Los Alamos is $1,021/month (pop-weighted across 2 census tracts, ACS 5-year 2023). 32% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q4
What percentage of Los Alamos residents are renters?
29% of Los Alamos households are renter-occupied (vs 32% in San Luis). The neighborhood has 7,374 residents.
Q5
Is Los Alamos a high social-vulnerability area?
Los Alamos sits in the 82nd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index (highly vulnerable). The index combines poverty, unemployment, household composition, racial/ethnic minority share, and housing/transportation factors across all US census tracts.
Q6
Which tracts in Los Alamos have the highest eviction risk?
The highest-risk constituent tract in Los Alamos is census tract 04027011408 (score 3.3/10). Across the 2 tracts in this neighborhood the score ranges from 3 to 3.3, a spread of 0.3 points.
Q7
How safe is Los Alamos for landlords?
Los Alamos carries a lower-tier eviction-risk profile for landlords (3.2/10). Pop-weighted across 2 constituent tracts, the score blends parent-city rent-control posture, county eviction-process timelines, and tract-specific rent-to-income / poverty signals. Compared to San Luis as a whole (3.7/10), this neighborhood is lower-risk.
Q8
What is the demographic breakdown of Los Alamos?
Los Alamos has 7,936 residents. Top groups: Hispanic / Latino (99.7%), White (non-Hispanic) (0.3%), Black (non-Hispanic) (0%). Source: ACS 5-year 2023, table B03002.
