McKinley Village Eviction Risk: High , Sacramento
Tract 06067006901 · Sacramento, CA · pop 1,637 · neighborhood within 1.2 mi
Census tract 06067006901 covers part of the McKinley Village area of Sacramento, CA, and scores 8.2/10 on landlord eviction risk. The severe-burden share is 33%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Sacramento and the region
Centroid at 38.5987, -121.4671 · click any tract to drill in
Why McKinley Village scores 8.2
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow McKinley Village compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 91
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 88%Socioeconomic
- 55%Household composition
- 63%Racial/ethnic minority
- 98%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 7%Grade B
- 7%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within McKinley Village. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 12.5%Housing insecurity
- 6.9%Utility-shutoff threat
- 14.1%Food insecurity
- 14.4%SNAP enrollment
- 8.2%Transit barriers
- 8.4%No health insurance
- 16.7%Frequent mental distress
- 32.8%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in McKinley Village
The dominant input is rent-regulation exposure at 8.5/10. On the high side, eviction-process difficulty reads 8.5/10. On the softer side, supply constraint reads 1.7/10.
Against Sacramento County at 50.2%, 58% of renters here are cost-burdened. Against the Sacramento County average of 7.1, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.1 points. Average gross rent is $1,483, 17% below the Sacramento average.
In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground C ("Definitely Declining"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. Nationally it ranks #6,676 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.
CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 9.2/10. Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the most pressured.
Annual rent works out to 23% of average household income of $78,527. 64% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
About tract 06067006901
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06067006901?
What is the average rent in tract 06067006901?
What is the poverty rate in tract 06067006901?
How socially vulnerable is tract 06067006901?
Is tract 06067006901 considered part of McKinley Village?
What share of households in tract 06067006901 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 06067006901 compare to Sacramento overall?
Was tract 06067006901 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Sacramento
Top eight tracts in Sacramento ranked by composite eviction-risk score.