Within parent city
0
th percentile
Very Low
Census Tract · Ranked #15,451 of 84,120 nationally
Foothill Farms Eviction Risk: Elevated
Tract 06067008130 · Sacramento, CA · pop 4,010 · 90% of tract blocks fall in Foothill Farms
06067008130 is a census tract in Foothill Farms, CA. It scores 6.5/10 for landlords. Population here is 4,010. Against Sacramento County at 50.2%, 29% of renters here are cost-burdened.
Risk score
6.5
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 5%
Stable renters 14%
Owners 81%
Tract context
Occupied units1,365
Renter share19.2%
SVI overall0.61
Poverty rate7.0%
Median income$86,645
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
34
th percentile
Low
Within state
33
th percentile
Low
National
82
th percentile
High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Foothill Farms and the region
Centroid at 38.6951, -121.3320 · click any tract to drill in
Why Foothill Farms scores 6.5
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Foothill Farms
6.6
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.3
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
7.0% poverty · this tract
1.7
Supply constraint
$2,165 rent vs county FMR
4.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from Foothill Farms
8.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.7
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Foothill Farms
9.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Foothill Farms
7.9
How Foothill Farms compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 61
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 51%Socioeconomic
- 92%Household composition
- 58%Racial/ethnic minority
- 35%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 13.2%Housing insecurity
- 6.8%Utility-shutoff threat
- 14.0%Food insecurity
- 13.4%SNAP enrollment
- 8.4%Transit barriers
- 8.2%No health insurance
- 18.9%Frequent mental distress
- 31.1%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Foothill Farms
The score leans hardest on tenant-organizing strength at 9/10. Sitting well above the midpoint, rent-regulation exposure reads 8.5/10. Average gross rent is $2,165, 28% above the Foothill Farms average.
Running cool, economic stress reads 1.7/10. 10% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.
Nationally it ranks #15,451 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. Only 19% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 6.5/10.
Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 1.0 points cooler. Of its three components the household composition measure is the most pressured.
It tracks the Sacramento County average of 7.1 closely. Annual rent works out to 30% of average household income of $86,645.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 06067008130
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06067008130?
Census tract 06067008130 in Foothill Farms scores 6.5/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 06067008130?
Median gross rent is $2,165/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 29% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 06067008130?
7.0% of residents in tract 06067008130 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,010.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 06067008130?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 61th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 51th, household 92th, minority 58th, housing 35th.
Q5
What share of households in tract 06067008130 struggle to pay rent?
About 13.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6
How does tract 06067008130 compare to Foothill Farms overall?
Tract 06067008130 scores 6.5/10, lower than the parent city of Foothill Farms at 7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Foothill Farms; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Foothill Farms
Top eight tracts in Foothill Farms ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · CA
06067007423
8.4
/ 10 · High
Tract · CA
06067007429
8.4
/ 10 · High
Tract · CA
06067007501
8.4
/ 10 · High
Tract · CA
06067007428
7.9
/ 10 · High
Tract · CA
06067007416
7.7
/ 10 · High
Tract · CA
06067007422
7.4
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · CA
06067007415
7.3
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · CA
06067007414
7.1
/ 10 · Elevated
Related