Crown Heights Eviction Risk: High

Pulling the other way is supply constraint, at 1.3/10. 24% are severely burdened, paying half their income or more in rent. That cohort has no absorption capacity for an unexpected bill, and it is where non-payment filings originate. 69% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building two streets over.

Sitting well above the midpoint is tenant-organizing strength at 8.3/10. Internally this is not one market. Tract scores span 7.1 to 8.5, so two buildings inside the same boundary can carry materially different risk.

On the high side is rent-regulation exposure at 8/10. At $1,827 a month, rents sit 21% under what the rest of Oceanside commands.

The poverty rate is 17%, which shows up in this model as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment. Among the 10 mapped neighborhoods of Oceanside, it ranks #3 by risk, the upper third.

For a like-for-like read, Oceana and Seaside score within a fraction of it. Social vulnerability runs high at 8.5/10, concentrating the disaster- and displacement-exposure this model treats as a lagging risk input.

Annual rent works out to 32% of average household income of $68,600.

For a specific building, read the per-tract breakdown below rather than the 8.2 headline, because the internal range is too wide to average safely. Scores move when the ACS release, the court-record feed, or the statute ledger behind them moves.