Skip to content
Sugar City, Colorado eviction risk overview
City brief · 464 residents

Sugar City, CO Eviction Risk: MODERATE

Crowley County · Population 464

In 2026
Risk score
4.1
MODERATE

36th percentile, Colorado.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min1.5 Average2.4 Now4.1
5.0 1.5 1976 · score 1.8 1977 · score 1.8 1978 · score 1.8 1979 · score 1.7 1980 · score 1.8 1981 · score 1.5 1982 · score 1.7 1983 · score 1.6 1984 · score 1.5 1985 · score 1.6 1986 · score 1.7 1987 · score 1.7 1988 · score 1.6 1989 · score 1.6 1990 · score 1.6 1991 · score 1.6 1992 · score 1.7 1993 · score 1.7 1994 · score 1.6 1995 · score 1.7 1996 · score 1.6 1997 · score 1.6 1998 · score 1.7 1999 · score 1.6 2000 · score 1.8 2001 · score 2.0 2002 · score 2.1 2003 · score 2.1 2004 · score 2.2 2005 · score 2.2 2006 · score 2.2 2007 · score 2.2 2008 · score 2.8 2009 · score 3.1 2010 · score 3.2 2011 · score 3.2 2012 · score 3.1 2013 · score 3.0 2014 · score 3.0 2015 · score 3.0 2016 · score 2.9 2017 · score 2.9 2018 · score 2.9 2019 · score 2.9 2020 · score 4.8 2021 · score 5.0 2022 · score 4.0 2023 · score 3.7 2024 · score 4.1 2025 · score 4.1 2026 · score 4.1

Key metrics

Estimated values: The U.S. Census suppresses field-level data for small places. Estimated from constituent census tracts, pop-weighted from real underlying ACS data.
Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 3.4 Regional 3.4 State 4.7 Economic 6.5 Supply 2.9 Rent Control 3.1 Eviction 4.3 Tenant 2.5 Housing 3.5 4.1 MODERATE
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    GOP margin +47.4% (2024)
    3.4
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    3.4
  3. State political climate
    Colorado legislature & governorship
    4.7
  4. Economic stress
    25.8% poverty · 5.0% unemp.
    6.5
  5. Supply constraint
    $812 average · 32.3% renters
    2.9
  6. Rent Control risk
    22.8% of income on rent
    3.1
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    109 days filing → judgment
    4.3
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    32.3% renters
    2.5
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    3.5
Geographic context

Risk heat across Sugar City and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Sugar City compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Crowley County
Low
#3 of 4 cities
Rank in county, 33rd percentileLowHigh
#3 of 4 cities in Crowley County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Colorado
Low
#351 of 479 cities
Rank in state, 27th percentileLowHigh
#351 of 479 cities in Colorado for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Sugar City risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Sugar City: 4.14.1Sugar CityThis cityCounty: 4.34.3Countyavg in countyState: 4.84.8Stateavg in stateU.S.: 4.74.7U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 4.1
    / 10 · MODERATE
    The verdict

    A Moderate-tier market.

    Composite 4.1/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a sharp climb.

    50-yr trend+2.3 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steepening since 2010 · COVID inflection visible

  2. 109d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $812/mo. A contested eviction takes 109 days and costs $4,648–$12,388 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 32.3%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 464 residents, 32.3% rent. 23% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 25.8% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 3.4
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Light-statute interior market.

    Local & regional political climate score 3.4 and 3.4 (GOP margin +47.4% (2024)). State climate at 4.7, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 4.7
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 4.7/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 4.3, housing court bias 3.5, rent-control risk 3.1. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +-0.7 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 6.5
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 6.5. Supply constraint: 2.9. The numbers behind those: 25.8% poverty, 5.0% unemployment, 23% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Sugar City sits in the slow & expensive quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Denver, CO · 98d · ~$8.6k all-in ($88/day) · score 5.7 Denver Colorado Springs, CO · 106d · ~$8.6k all-in ($81/day) · score 4.4 Colorado Springs Aurora, CO · 94d · ~$9.3k all-in ($99/day) · score 5.4 Aurora Fort Collins, CO · 106d · ~$9.0k all-in ($85/day) · score 5.4 Fort Collins Lakewood, CO · 91d · ~$8.7k all-in ($96/day) · score 5.2 Lakewood Thornton, CO · 98d · ~$7.9k all-in ($80/day) · score 4.5 Thornton Arvada, CO · 109d · ~$8.2k all-in ($75/day) · score 4.5 Arvada Westminster, CO · 99d · ~$7.3k all-in ($74/day) · score 4.4 Westminster Pueblo, CO · 91d · ~$8.8k all-in ($97/day) · score 5.2 Pueblo Greeley, CO · 105d · ~$8.0k all-in ($76/day) · score 4.6 Greeley Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.8 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 2.8 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 3.1 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 3.4 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 7.1 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 5.7 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.7 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 7.9 Seattle Sugar City
Sugar City · 109d · ~$8.5k all-in ($78/day) · score 4.1 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0–4   4–7   7–10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Sugar City, CO

Landlording in Sugar City, Colorado, presents a manageable operating environment for documented landlords. The Eviction Risk Score is 4.1/10 (MODERATE tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Mid-tier market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Sugar City is a city of 464 residents where 32.3% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 22.8% of income on rent. At an average rent of $812/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Sugar City eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 4.3/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Sugar City closes 109 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Sugar City's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 3.5/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Sugar City runs $4,648 to $12,388 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 109 days of typical timeline and $812/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 2.5/10 in Sugar City, and the city has limited rent control exposure (3.1/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Colorado, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Sugar City: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a MODERATE tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Colorado's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $12,388 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Sugar City

Trap · 47.7 POINTS
Politically, Crowley County voted Republican by 47.7 points in 2020, a baseline that correlates with landlord-neutral legislative pressure. Combined with 22.8% rent-to-income ratio, expect baseline enforcement of CRS 13-40 + HB23-1115.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

Can I evict a tenant for any reason in Sugar City?

Colorado doesn't have statewide just-cause eviction, so yes, you can terminate a tenancy without cause, but you must provide proper notice. For a month-to-month lease, this is typically a 91-day notice. Always check your lease terms and follow the notice period strictly.

Q2

How long does it really take to evict someone for non-payment?

Our data shows an average of 109 days in Sugar City, CO. This includes the notice period, court proceedings, and potential lockout. Don't expect it to be a quick process. Start early and prepare for delays.

Q3

What if my tenant pays part of the overdue rent after I send the 10-day notice?

Accepting partial payment usually waives your right to proceed with the eviction based on that specific 10-day notice. You'd likely have to issue a new notice if the remaining balance isn't paid. It's often best to insist on full payment or decline partial payments if you intend to evict.

Q4

Do I need a lawyer for an eviction in Sugar City?

While you can represent yourself, it's highly recommended to consult or hire an attorney, especially if the tenant contests the eviction. Eviction law is complex, and even minor procedural errors can cause significant delays or lead to your case being dismissed. Given the typical costs and timelines, a lawyer can save you money and headaches in the long run.

Q5

Can I charge whatever I want for a security deposit?

No. In Colorado, security deposits are capped at 2.00 months' rent. So, if your rent is $812, you can charge up to $1,624. You also have strict rules about how and when to return it.

Q6

What about rent control in Sugar City?

Colorado has a statewide ban on rent control. This means no city, including Sugar City, can implement rent control measures. You can typically raise rent to market rates, provided you give proper notice as outlined in your lease and state law. Learn more about Colorado rent control rules.

06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 4.1/10 places Sugar City in the 36th percentile of Colorado cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has risen sharply since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.