The Rosery Eviction Risk: Moderate

32% are severely burdened, paying half their income or more in rent. That cohort has no absorption capacity for an unexpected bill, and it is where non-payment filings originate. The clearest offset is eviction-process difficulty, at 1.5/10. Annualized rent equals 33% of average household income here, past the 30% affordability line, which compresses the margin any screening standard has to work with.

The 6 tracts inside this boundary do not behave alike. Individual scores run 3.6 to 5.4, a 1.8-point gap wide enough that the area average misleads on any specific address. On the high side is tenant-organizing strength at 7.9/10. On the softer side is supply constraint, at 2.4/10.

Court records carry 2,857 eviction filings across its 4 observed tracts. The poverty rate is 18%, which shows up in this model as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment. At $1,421 a month, rents sit 12% under what the rest of Largo commands.

The worst year on record was 2006, when filings touched 21.4% of renter households. The most recent observed rate, 6.1% in 2017, is well off that peak. Among the 5 mapped neighborhoods of Largo, it ranks #2 by risk, the middle third.

Social vulnerability runs high at 8.1/10, concentrating the disaster- and displacement-exposure this model treats as a lagging risk input.

For a specific building, read the per-tract breakdown below rather than the 4.9 headline, because the internal range is too wide to average safely. Scores move when the ACS release, the court-record feed, or the statute ledger behind them moves.