Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #24,859 of 84,120 nationally

The Rosery Eviction Risk: Moderate , Largo

Tract 12103025602 · Pinellas, FL · pop 3,394 · neighborhood within 0.3 mi

With a score of 5.4/10, tract 12103025602 in the The Rosery area of Largo, FL reads moderate for landlord eviction risk. It is home to 3,394 residents. Severe burden reaches 40%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.

Risk score
5.4
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 31% Stable renters 8% Owners 61%
Tract context
Occupied units1,383
Renter share39.0%
SVI overall0.97
Poverty rate27.8%
Median income$43,750

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
80 th percentile
Rank, 80th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 6 tracts In The Rosery
High
Within parent city
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 31 tracts In Largo
Very High
Within county
97 th percentile
Rank, 97th percentileLowHigh
#10 of 273 tracts In Pinellas
Very High
Within state
90 th percentile
Rank, 90th percentileLowHigh
#495 of 5,122 tracts In Florida
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Largo and the region

Centroid at 27.9261, -82.7932 · click any tract to drill in

Why The Rosery scores 5.4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Largo
5.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.0
State political climate
Florida legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
27.8% poverty · this tract
6.9
Supply constraint
$1,549 rent vs county FMR
2.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from Largo
7.8
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Largo
8.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Largo
6.9

How The Rosery compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
The Rosery risk score vs. parent city / county / state5.4This tracttract 0256024.0Largoparent city3.9Countyavg tract in county4.1Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 97

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 1,603Total filings over 18 yrs
  • 14.78%Avg annual filing rate
  • 21.4%Peak (2005)
  • 49Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2000 to 2017
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 12103025602
Filings dropped 23% over the past 18 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 276Total filings 2020-21
  • 3.8Avg monthly (observed)
  • 5.5Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.69×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-01-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Tacoma, WA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within The Rosery. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in The Rosery

Against Pinellas County at 53.4%, 79% of renters here are cost-burdened. Annualized rent equals 42% of average household income of $43,750, past the 30% affordability line, which thins the margin any screening standard has to work with.

The main counterweight is state political climate at 1.5/10. Running cool, eviction-process difficulty reads 1.6/10. The poverty rate is 28%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment.

It sits 1.6 points above the Pinellas County average of 3.8. Running hot, tenant-organizing strength reads 8/10. Court records carry 1,603 eviction filings across 18 observed years.

Adults with no health insurance runs 18.4% against 11.3% nationally. Filings peaked in 2005 at 21.4% of renter households.

In a typical year about 14.8% of renter households face a filing. Nationally it ranks #24,859 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 9.8/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 12103025602

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 12103025602?

Census tract 12103025602 in the The Rosery neighborhood scores 5.4/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 12103025602?

Median gross rent is $1,549/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 79% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 12103025602?

27.8% of residents in tract 12103025602 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,394.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 12103025602?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 97th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 92th, household 91th, minority 66th, housing 98th.
Q5

Is tract 12103025602 considered part of The Rosery?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 12103025602 fall within The Rosery (neighborhood centroid within 0.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 12103025602?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 1,603 eviction filings across 18 validated years in tract 12103025602 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 14.78% of renter households, peaking at 21.4% in 2005. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 12103025602 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.69× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings dropped sharply, likely a moratorium effect. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Tacoma, WA), 2020-2021.
Q8

How does tract 12103025602 compare to Largo overall?

Tract 12103025602 scores 5.4/10, higher than the parent city of Largo at 4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Largo eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Largo

Top eight tracts in Largo ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related