Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #20,572 of 84,120 nationally

The Rosery Eviction Risk: Moderate , Largo

Tract 12103025602 · Pinellas, FL · pop 3,394 · neighborhood within 0.3 mi

Census tract 12103025602 runs through the The Rosery area of Largo. With 3,394 residents, it scores 5.9/10 for landlords. On the national scale it ranks #23,296 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

About 79% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 40% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,549 a month while the average household earns $43,750 a year, roughly 42% of income at the averages. About 39% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
5.6
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 31% Stable renters 8% Owners 61%
Tract context
Occupied units1,383
Renter share39.0%
SVI overall0.97
Poverty rate27.8%
Median income$43,750

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 6 tracts In The Rosery
Very High
Within parent city
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 31 tracts In Largo
Very High
Within county
98 th percentile
Rank, 98th percentileLowHigh
#7 of 273 tracts In Pinellas
Very High
Within state
94 th percentile
Rank, 94th percentileLowHigh
#332 of 5,122 tracts In Florida
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Largo and the region

Centroid at 27.9261, -82.7932 · click any tract to drill in

Why The Rosery scores 5.6

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Largo
5.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.0
State political climate
Florida legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
27.8% poverty · this tract
6.9
Supply constraint
$1,549 rent vs county FMR
2.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from Largo
7.8
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Largo
8.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Largo
6.9

How The Rosery compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
The Rosery risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 5.65.6This tracttract 025602Largo: 2.42.4Largoparent cityCounty: 3.93.9Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.93.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 97

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 1,603Total filings over 18 yrs
  • 14.78%Avg annual filing rate
  • 21.4%Peak (2005)
  • 49Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2000 to 2017
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 121030256022000: 64 filings (9.84/100 renter HHs)2001: 66 filings (10.15/100 renter HHs)2002: 84 filings (12.92/100 renter HHs)2003: 108 filings (16.61/100 renter HHs)2004: 108 filings (16.61/100 renter HHs)2005: 116 filings (21.38/100 renter HHs)2006: 93 filings (17.14/100 renter HHs)2007: 96 filings (17.69/100 renter HHs)2008: 103 filings (18.98/100 renter HHs)2009: 95 filings (17.51/100 renter HHs)2010: 47 filings (6.65/100 renter HHs)2011: 70 filings (11.18/100 renter HHs)2012: 97 filings (15.50/100 renter HHs)2013: 116 filings (18.53/100 renter HHs)2014: 106 filings (16.93/100 renter HHs)2015: 107 filings (17.09/100 renter HHs)2016: 78 filings (13.13/100 renter HHs)2017: 49 filings (8.25/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 23% over the past 18 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 276Total filings 2020-21
  • 3.8Avg monthly (observed)
  • 5.5Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.69×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-01-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 5 filings (0.87× baseline)2020-02-01: 2 filings (0.33× baseline)2020-03-01: 2 filings (0.35× baseline)2020-04-01: 1 filings (0.21× baseline)2020-05-01: 1 filings (0.15× baseline)2020-06-01: 4 filings (1.07× baseline)2020-07-01: 4 filings (0.73× baseline)2020-08-01: 7 filings (0.78× baseline)2020-09-01: 3 filings (0.55× baseline)2020-10-01: 2 filings (0.36× baseline)2020-11-01: 2 filings (0.53× baseline)2020-12-01: 6 filings (1.14× baseline)2021-01-01: 1 filings (0.17× baseline)2021-02-01: 7 filings (1.17× baseline)2021-03-01: 4 filings (0.70× baseline)2021-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 15 filings (4.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 2 filings (0.36× baseline)2021-08-01: 6 filings (0.67× baseline)2021-09-01: 9 filings (1.64× baseline)2021-10-01: 6 filings (1.09× baseline)2021-11-01: 4 filings (1.07× baseline)2021-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 2 filings (0.35× baseline)2022-02-01: 2 filings (0.33× baseline)2022-03-01: 2 filings (0.35× baseline)2022-04-01: 4 filings (0.84× baseline)2022-05-01: 4 filings (0.62× baseline)2022-06-01: 7 filings (1.87× baseline)2022-07-01: 4 filings (0.73× baseline)2022-08-01: 6 filings (0.67× baseline)2022-09-01: 7 filings (1.27× baseline)2022-10-01: 5 filings (0.91× baseline)2022-11-01: 1 filings (0.27× baseline)2022-12-01: 1 filings (0.19× baseline)2023-01-01: 1 filings (0.17× baseline)2023-02-01: 3 filings (0.50× baseline)2023-03-01: 2 filings (0.35× baseline)2023-04-01: 4 filings (0.84× baseline)2023-05-01: 5 filings (0.77× baseline)2023-06-01: 1 filings (0.27× baseline)2023-07-01: 3 filings (0.55× baseline)2023-08-01: 2 filings (0.22× baseline)2023-09-01: 4 filings (0.73× baseline)2023-10-01: 6 filings (1.09× baseline)2023-11-01: 2 filings (0.53× baseline)2023-12-01: 3 filings (0.57× baseline)2024-01-01: 8 filings (1.39× baseline)2024-02-01: 5 filings (0.83× baseline)2024-03-01: 4 filings (0.70× baseline)2024-04-01: 4 filings (0.84× baseline)2024-05-01: 5 filings (0.77× baseline)2024-06-01: 3 filings (0.80× baseline)2024-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 8 filings (0.89× baseline)2024-09-01: 2 filings (0.36× baseline)2024-10-01: 4 filings (0.73× baseline)2024-11-01: 4 filings (1.07× baseline)2024-12-01: 6 filings (1.14× baseline)2025-01-01: 9 filings (1.57× baseline)2025-02-01: 4 filings (0.67× baseline)2025-03-01: 9 filings (1.57× baseline)2025-04-01: 2 filings (0.42× baseline)2025-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 4 filings (1.07× baseline)2025-07-01: 3 filings (0.55× baseline)2025-08-01: 6 filings (0.67× baseline)2025-09-01: 2 filings (0.36× baseline)2025-10-01: 4 filings (0.73× baseline)2025-11-01: 2 filings (0.53× baseline)2025-12-01: 4 filings (0.76× baseline)2026-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Tacoma, WA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within The Rosery. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in The Rosery

The score leans hardest on tenant organizing strength at $1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Largo eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Pinellas County average of 4.8 and above the Florida statewide average of 4.9. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

During 2020 and 2021, eviction filings here ran at about 0.69x the pre-COVID monthly baseline, well below the pre-pandemic norm, the signature of an eviction moratorium at work.

The tract is White and Black and ranks around the 97th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 12103025602

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 12103025602?

Census tract 12103025602 in the The Rosery neighborhood scores 5.6/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 12103025602?

Median gross rent is $1,549/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 79% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 12103025602?

27.8% of residents in tract 12103025602 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,394.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 12103025602?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 97th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 92th, household 91th, minority 66th, housing 98th.
Q5

Is tract 12103025602 considered part of The Rosery?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 12103025602 fall within The Rosery (neighborhood centroid within 0.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 12103025602?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 1,603 eviction filings across 18 validated years in tract 12103025602 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 14.78% of renter households, peaking at 21.4% in 2005. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 12103025602 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.69× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings dropped sharply, likely a moratorium effect. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Tacoma, WA), 2020-2021.
Q8

How does tract 12103025602 compare to Largo overall?

Tract 12103025602 scores 5.6/10, higher than the parent city of Largo at 2.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Largo eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Largo

Top eight tracts in Largo ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related