Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #3,082 of 84,120 nationally

Fruit Belt Eviction Risk: High , Buffalo

Tract 36029003502 · Erie County, NY · pop 1,977 · neighborhood within 0.9 mi

36029003502 is a census tract in the Fruit Belt area of Buffalo, NY. It scores 9.3/10 for landlords. Population here is 1,977. It sits 2.5 points above the Erie County average of 6.8.

Risk score
9.3
High
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 31% Stable renters 23% Owners 46%
Tract context
Occupied units812
Renter share54.1%
SVI overall0.80
Poverty rate19.3%
Median income$28,090

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
29 th percentile
Rank, 29th percentileLowHigh
#6 of 8 tracts In Fruit Belt
Low
Within parent city
96 th percentile
Rank, 96th percentileLowHigh
#5 of 91 tracts In Buffalo
Very High
Within county
78 th percentile
Rank, 78th percentileLowHigh
#58 of 260 tracts In Erie County
High
Within state
72 th percentile
Rank, 72nd percentileLowHigh
#1,493 of 5,394 tracts In New York
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Buffalo and the region

Centroid at 42.9089, -78.8411 · click any tract to drill in

Why Fruit Belt scores 9.3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Buffalo
8.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.7
State political climate
New York legislature & governorship
7.3
Economic stress
19.3% poverty · this tract
4.8
Supply constraint
$841 rent vs county FMR
2.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Buffalo
7.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
8.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Buffalo
7.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Buffalo
7.5

How Fruit Belt compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Fruit Belt risk score vs. parent city / county / state9.3This tracttract 0035027.9Buffaloparent city6.8Countyavg tract in county7.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 80

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Fruit Belt. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Fruit Belt

Cost burden runs 58% here against 44.6% across Erie County. 25% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.

Housing insecurity runs 33.1% against 14.2% nationally. Set annual rent against average income of $28,090 and the ratio lands at 36%, above the conventional 30% ceiling.

What pushes it up most is local political climate at 8/10. Inability to pay a utility bill runs 24.4% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two. On the high side, eviction-process difficulty reads 8/10.

On the softer side, supply constraint reads 2.2/10. At $841 a month, rents run 20% under what the rest of Buffalo commands. The poverty rate is 19%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest.

In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground C ("Definitely Declining"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. On the national scale it lands near the 96th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 36029003502

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 36029003502?

Census tract 36029003502 in the Fruit Belt neighborhood scores 9.3/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 36029003502?

Median gross rent is $841/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 58% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 36029003502?

19.3% of residents in tract 36029003502 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,977.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 36029003502?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 80th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 87th, household 94th, minority 99th, housing 20th.
Q5

Is tract 36029003502 considered part of Fruit Belt?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 36029003502 fall within Fruit Belt (neighborhood centroid within 0.9 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 36029003502 struggle to pay rent?

About 33.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 24.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 36029003502 compare to Buffalo overall?

Tract 36029003502 scores 9.3/10, higher than the parent city of Buffalo at 7.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Buffalo eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 36029003502 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Buffalo

Top eight tracts in Buffalo ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related