Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally

Acoma Court Eviction Risk: Lower , Surprise

Tract 04013061032 · Maricopa, AZ · pop 5,971 · neighborhood within 0.1 mi

With a score of 3/10, tract 04013061032 in the Acoma Court area of Surprise, AZ reads lower for landlord eviction risk. Population here is 5,971. Against Maricopa County at 46.0%, 61% of renters here are cost-burdened.

Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 16% Stable renters 11% Owners 73%
Tract context
Occupied units2,006
Renter share26.9%
SVI overall0.11
Poverty rate8.3%
Median income$101,000

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 2 tracts In Acoma Court
Very Low
Within parent city
29 th percentile
Rank, 29th percentileLowHigh
#21 of 29 tracts In Surprise
Low
Within county
40 th percentile
Rank, 40th percentileLowHigh
#609 of 1,009 tracts In Maricopa
Low
Within state
40 th percentile
Rank, 40th percentileLowHigh
#1,065 of 1,765 tracts In Arizona
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Surprise and the region

Centroid at 33.6184, -112.4027 · click any tract to drill in

Why Acoma Court scores 3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Surprise
2.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.1
State political climate
Arizona legislature & governorship
2.2
Economic stress
8.3% poverty · this tract
2.1
Supply constraint
$2,112 rent vs county FMR
5.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from Surprise
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Surprise
1.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Surprise
2.0

How Acoma Court compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Acoma Court risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.03.0This tracttract 061032Surprise: 3.23.2Surpriseparent cityCounty: 3.73.7Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.83.8Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 11

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 89Total filings over 5 yrs
  • 1,651.30%Avg annual filing rate
  • 248.5%Peak (2005)
  • 47Filings in 2005 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2001 to 2005
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 040130610322001: 1 filings (190.67/100 renter HHs)2002: 3 filings (572.00/100 renter HHs)2003: 10 filings (1,906.67/100 renter HHs)2004: 28 filings (5,338.67/100 renter HHs)2005: 47 filings (248.47/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 4,600% over the past 5 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Acoma Court. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Acoma Court

Pulling hardest the other way is rent-regulation exposure at 1/10. On the high side, court filing pressure reads 8.9/10.

Running cool, tenant-organizing strength reads 1.5/10. Severe burden reaches 19%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. The filing record is not thin: 89 evictions over 5 years of observation.

It sits 0.7 points below the Maricopa County average of 3.7. The worst year on record was 2005, when 248.5% of renter households were served. In a typical year about 1,651.3% of renter households face a filing.

Nationally it ranks #67,219 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 2/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.

Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the least pressured. Average gross rent is $2,112, close to the Surprise average. Annual rent works out to 25% of average household income of $101,000.

27% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 04013061032

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 04013061032?

Census tract 04013061032 in the Acoma Court neighborhood scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 04013061032?

Median gross rent is $2,112/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 61% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 04013061032?

8.3% of residents in tract 04013061032 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,971.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 04013061032?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 11th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 25th, household 24th, minority 53th, housing 4th.
Q5

Is tract 04013061032 considered part of Acoma Court?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 04013061032 fall within Acoma Court (neighborhood centroid within 0.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 04013061032?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 89 eviction filings across 5 validated years in tract 04013061032 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 1,651.30% of renter households, peaking at 248.5% in 2005. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 04013061032 struggle to pay rent?

About 11.4% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 04013061032 compare to Surprise overall?

Tract 04013061032 scores 3/10, right in line with the parent city of Surprise at 3.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Surprise eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Surprise

Top eight tracts in Surprise ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related