Within neighborhood
50
th percentile
Moderate
Neighborhood · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally
Westward Look Heights Eviction Risk: Lower , Catalina Foothills
Tract 04019004713 · Pima, AZ · pop 4,293 · neighborhood within 0.9 mi
Census tract 04019004713 covers part of the Westward Look Heights area of Catalina Foothills, AZ, and scores 3/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 4,293 residents. Severe burden reaches 39%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.
Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 10%
Stable renters 6%
Owners 84%
Tract context
Occupied units1,992
Renter share15.9%
SVI overall0.12
Poverty rate5.4%
Median income$147,500
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
56
th percentile
Elevated
Within county
32
th percentile
Low
Within state
40
th percentile
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Catalina Foothills and the region
Centroid at 32.3487, -110.9535 · click any tract to drill in
Why Westward Look Heights scores 3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Catalina Foothills
7.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.9
State political climate
Arizona legislature & governorship
2.2
Economic stress
5.4% poverty · this tract
1.4
Supply constraint
tract rent vs county FMR
5.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Catalina Foothills
4.1
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.7
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Catalina Foothills
5.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Catalina Foothills
3.5
How Westward Look Heights compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 12
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 4%Socioeconomic
- 12%Household composition
- 38%Racial/ethnic minority
- 45%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 49Total filings over 11 yrs
- 1.33%Avg annual filing rate
- 2.6%Peak (2004)
- 1Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings dropped 100% over the past 12 months.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 4.4%Housing insecurity
- 3.4%Utility-shutoff threat
- 5.6%Food insecurity
- 3.9%SNAP enrollment
- 4.0%Transit barriers
- 5.0%No health insurance
- 11.3%Frequent mental distress
- 30.6%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Westward Look Heights
Against Pima County at 43.8%, 62% of renters here are cost-burdened. Pulling hardest the other way is economic stress at 1.4/10. Sitting well above the midpoint, court filing pressure reads 8.4/10.
Well under the midpoint, eviction-process difficulty reads 1.7/10. Food insecurity runs 5.6% against 17.8% nationally.
It sits 0.9 points below the Pima County average of 3.9. The filing record is not thin: 49 evictions over 11 years of observation. Inability to pay a utility bill runs 3.4% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two.
The worst year on record was 2004, when 2.6% of renter households were served. In a typical year about 1.3% of renter households face a filing. On the national scale it lands near the 20th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.
Only 16% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices. Social vulnerability reads 2.1/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
Frequently asked
About tract 04019004713
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 04019004713?
Census tract 04019004713 in the Westward Look Heights neighborhood scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the poverty rate in tract 04019004713?
5.4% of residents in tract 04019004713 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,293.
Q3
How socially vulnerable is tract 04019004713?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 12th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 4th, household 12th, minority 38th, housing 45th.
Q4
Is tract 04019004713 considered part of Westward Look Heights?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 04019004713 fall within Westward Look Heights (neighborhood centroid within 0.9 miles, OSM data).
Q5
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 04019004713?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 49 eviction filings across 11 validated years in tract 04019004713 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 1.33% of renter households, peaking at 2.6% in 2004. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6
What share of households in tract 04019004713 struggle to pay rent?
About 4.4% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 04019004713 compare to Catalina Foothills overall?
Tract 04019004713 scores 3/10, lower than the parent city of Catalina Foothills at 3.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Catalina Foothills eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Catalina Foothills
Top eight tracts in Catalina Foothills ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related