Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #72,539 of 84,120 nationally

Whitewing in the San Tans Eviction Risk: Lower , San Tan Valley

Tract 04021000229 · Pinal, AZ · pop 5,166 · neighborhood within 0.8 mi

The Moderate-tier score of 5.1/10 for census tract 04021000229 reflects conditions in Whitewing in the San Tans in San Tan Valley, Arizona. That is riskier than roughly 44% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

48% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 7% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,583 a month against an average household income of $83,154 a year, roughly 23% of income at the averages. About 28% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
2.1
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 13% Stable renters 14% Owners 73%
Tract context
Occupied units2,032
Renter share27.7%
SVI overall0.32
Poverty rate2.9%
Median income$83,154

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 2 tracts In Whitewing in the San Tans
Very Low
Within parent city
56 th percentile
Rank, 56th percentileLowHigh
#9 of 19 tracts In San Tan Valley
Elevated
Within county
17 th percentile
Rank, 17th percentileLowHigh
#79 of 95 tracts In Pinal
Very Low
Within state
18 th percentile
Rank, 18th percentileLowHigh
#1,443 of 1,765 tracts In Arizona
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across San Tan Valley and the region

Centroid at 33.1369, -111.5639 · click any tract to drill in

Why Whitewing in the San Tans scores 2.1

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from San Tan Valley
4.7
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.1
State political climate
Arizona legislature & governorship
2.2
Economic stress
2.9% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,583 rent vs county FMR
3.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from San Tan Valley
5.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from San Tan Valley
4.4
Housing court bias
Inherited from San Tan Valley
4.9

How Whitewing in the San Tans compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Whitewing in the San Tans risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 2.12.1This tracttract 000229San Tan Valley: 2.62.6San Tan Valleyparent cityCounty: 3.43.4Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.63.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 32

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Whitewing in the San Tans. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Whitewing in the San Tans

The heaviest input here is rent-control risk at 5.5/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from San Tan Valley eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Pinal County average of 4.9 and in line with the Arizona statewide average of 4.9. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 32nd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

In CDC survey modeling, about 8.9% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 6.1% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 04021000229

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 04021000229?

Census tract 04021000229 in the Whitewing in the San Tans neighborhood scores 2.1/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 04021000229?

Median gross rent is $1,583/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 48% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 04021000229?

2.9% of residents in tract 04021000229 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,166.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 04021000229?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 32th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 52th, household 65th, minority 19th, housing 10th.
Q5

Is tract 04021000229 considered part of Whitewing in the San Tans?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 04021000229 fall within Whitewing in the San Tans (neighborhood centroid within 0.8 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 04021000229 struggle to pay rent?

About 8.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.1% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 04021000229 compare to San Tan Valley overall?

Tract 04021000229 scores 2.1/10, lower than the parent city of San Tan Valley at 2.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from San Tan Valley eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in San Tan Valley

Top eight tracts in San Tan Valley ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related