Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #48,083 of 84,120 nationally

Hidden Hills Eviction Risk: Lower , Redan

Tract 13089023211 · DeKalb County, GA · pop 3,850 · neighborhood within 0.8 mi

With a score of 6.8/10, tract 13089023211 in Hidden Hills in Redan ranks in the Elevated tier for landlord eviction risk. The tract is home to 3,850 residents. That is riskier than roughly 92% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

About 61% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 36% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,498 monthly, set against $71,981 in average yearly household income, roughly 25% of income at the averages. Renters make up 35% of occupied homes.

Risk score
3.6
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 21% Stable renters 14% Owners 65%
Tract context
Occupied units1,378
Renter share34.9%
SVI overall0.64
Poverty rate11.7%
Median income$71,981

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#3 of 5 tracts In Hidden Hills
Moderate
Within parent city
38 th percentile
Rank, 38th percentileLowHigh
#6 of 9 tracts In Redan
Low
Within county
55 th percentile
Rank, 55th percentileLowHigh
#92 of 203 tracts In DeKalb County
Elevated
Within state
49 th percentile
Rank, 49th percentileLowHigh
#1,413 of 2,791 tracts In Georgia
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across Redan and the region

Centroid at 33.7409, -84.1891 · click any tract to drill in

Why Hidden Hills scores 3.6

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Redan
8.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.4
State political climate
Georgia legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
11.7% poverty · this tract
2.9
Supply constraint
$1,498 rent vs county FMR
3.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Redan
8.7
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Redan
8.3
Housing court bias
Inherited from Redan
7.3

How Hidden Hills compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Hidden Hills risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.63.6This tracttract 023211Redan: 3.03.0Redanparent cityCounty: 3.53.5Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.73.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 64

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 2,241Total filings over 8 yrs
  • 53.18%Avg annual filing rate
  • 70.5%Peak (2015)
  • 297Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2004 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 130890232112004: 179 filings (39.51/100 renter HHs)2007: 310 filings (68.89/100 renter HHs)2011: 261 filings (48.79/100 renter HHs)2012: 210 filings (39.25/100 renter HHs)2013: 270 filings (50.47/100 renter HHs)2014: 337 filings (62.99/100 renter HHs)2015: 377 filings (70.47/100 renter HHs)2016: 297 filings (45.07/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 66% over the past 8 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 1,697Total filings 2020-21
  • 22.3Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.0Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.00×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-04-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 25 filings (250.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 26 filings (260.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 20 filings (200.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 50 filings (500.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 19 filings (190.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 21 filings (210.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 27 filings (270.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 16 filings (160.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 22 filings (220.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 15 filings (150.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 12 filings (120.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 20 filings (200.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 17 filings (170.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 33 filings (330.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 28 filings (280.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 23 filings (230.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 37 filings (370.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 27 filings (270.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 29 filings (290.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 19 filings (190.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 29 filings (290.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 21 filings (210.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 29 filings (290.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 25 filings (250.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 21 filings (210.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 35 filings (350.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 34 filings (340.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 35 filings (350.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 32 filings (320.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 20 filings (200.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 38 filings (380.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 22 filings (220.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 21 filings (210.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 24 filings (240.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 31 filings (310.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 33 filings (330.00× baseline)2023-07-01: 36 filings (360.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 18 filings (180.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 42 filings (420.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 45 filings (450.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 26 filings (260.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 31 filings (310.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 32 filings (320.00× baseline)2024-02-01: 26 filings (260.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 22 filings (220.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 12 filings (120.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 13 filings (130.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 27 filings (270.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 39 filings (390.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 23 filings (230.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 23 filings (230.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 20 filings (200.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 32 filings (320.00× baseline)2025-02-01: 23 filings (230.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 17 filings (170.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 17 filings (170.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 25 filings (250.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 15 filings (150.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 25 filings (250.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 21 filings (210.00× baseline)2025-10-01: 27 filings (270.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 25 filings (250.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 17 filings (170.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 17 filings (170.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 19 filings (190.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 15 filings (150.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Atlanta, GA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Hidden Hills. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Hidden Hills

The heaviest input here is rent-control risk at 8.7/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Redan eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the DeKalb County average of 6.4 and above the Georgia statewide average of 5.6. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 19.1% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 12.6% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

The tract is predominantly Black and ranks around the 64th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 13089023211

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 13089023211?

Census tract 13089023211 in the Hidden Hills neighborhood scores 3.6/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 13089023211?

Median gross rent is $1,498/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 61% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 13089023211?

11.7% of residents in tract 13089023211 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,850.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 13089023211?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 64th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 57th, household 59th, minority 97th, housing 48th.
Q5

Is tract 13089023211 considered part of Hidden Hills?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 13089023211 fall within Hidden Hills (neighborhood centroid within 0.8 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 13089023211?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 2,241 eviction filings across 8 validated years in tract 13089023211 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 53.18% of renter households, peaking at 70.5% in 2015. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 13089023211 struggle to pay rent?

About 19.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 12.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 13089023211 compare to Redan overall?

Tract 13089023211 scores 3.6/10, higher than the parent city of Redan at 3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Redan eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Redan

Top eight tracts in Redan ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related