Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #53,267 of 84,120 nationally

Hidden Hills Eviction Risk: Lower , Redan

Tract 13089023212 · DeKalb County, GA · pop 3,358 · neighborhood within 0.6 mi

For landlords sizing up the Hidden Hills neighborhood of Redan, census tract 13089023212 carries an elevated eviction-risk score of 6.1/10. It lands near the 78th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

29% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a moderate level, and 22% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,586 a month while the average household earns $73,667 a year, roughly 26% of income at the averages. About 34% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
3.3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 10% Stable renters 24% Owners 66%
Tract context
Occupied units1,300
Renter share34.4%
SVI overall0.64
Poverty rate8.1%
Median income$73,667

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
25 th percentile
Rank, 25th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 5 tracts In Hidden Hills
Low
Within parent city
25 th percentile
Rank, 25th percentileLowHigh
#7 of 9 tracts In Redan
Low
Within county
45 th percentile
Rank, 45th percentileLowHigh
#112 of 203 tracts In DeKalb County
Moderate
Within state
43 th percentile
Rank, 43rd percentileLowHigh
#1,583 of 2,791 tracts In Georgia
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across Redan and the region

Centroid at 33.7403, -84.1729 · click any tract to drill in

Why Hidden Hills scores 3.3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Redan
8.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.4
State political climate
Georgia legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
8.1% poverty · this tract
2.0
Supply constraint
$1,586 rent vs county FMR
3.7
Rent control risk
Inherited from Redan
8.7
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Redan
8.3
Housing court bias
Inherited from Redan
7.3

How Hidden Hills compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Hidden Hills risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.33.3This tracttract 023212Redan: 3.03.0Redanparent cityCounty: 3.53.5Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.73.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 64

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 1,771Total filings over 8 yrs
  • 53.04%Avg annual filing rate
  • 61.5%Peak (2011)
  • 239Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2004 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 130890232122004: 206 filings (61.13/100 renter HHs)2007: 135 filings (34.35/100 renter HHs)2011: 264 filings (61.54/100 renter HHs)2012: 243 filings (56.64/100 renter HHs)2013: 200 filings (46.62/100 renter HHs)2014: 252 filings (58.74/100 renter HHs)2015: 232 filings (54.08/100 renter HHs)2016: 239 filings (51.18/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 16% over the past 8 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 1,096Total filings 2020-21
  • 14.4Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.0Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.00×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-04-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 17 filings (170.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 18 filings (180.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 13 filings (130.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 20 filings (200.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 12 filings (120.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 10 filings (100.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 9 filings (90.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 12 filings (120.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 10 filings (100.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 11 filings (110.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 11 filings (110.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 18 filings (180.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 12 filings (120.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 15 filings (150.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 12 filings (120.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 13 filings (130.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 9 filings (90.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 22 filings (220.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 22 filings (220.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 23 filings (230.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 23 filings (230.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 21 filings (210.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 17 filings (170.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 21 filings (210.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 16 filings (160.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 22 filings (220.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 22 filings (220.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 17 filings (170.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 36 filings (360.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 26 filings (260.00× baseline)2023-07-01: 28 filings (280.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 25 filings (250.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 17 filings (170.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 18 filings (180.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 20 filings (200.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 18 filings (180.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2024-02-01: 32 filings (320.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 16 filings (160.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 14 filings (140.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 15 filings (150.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 37 filings (370.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 14 filings (140.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 18 filings (180.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 15 filings (150.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 16 filings (160.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 15 filings (150.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 12 filings (120.00× baseline)2025-02-01: 10 filings (100.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 21 filings (210.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 29 filings (290.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 11 filings (110.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 14 filings (140.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 38 filings (380.00× baseline)2025-10-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 12 filings (120.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 12 filings (120.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 15 filings (150.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Atlanta, GA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Hidden Hills. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Hidden Hills

The score leans hardest on rent-control risk at 8.7/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Redan eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the DeKalb County average of 6.4 and above the Georgia statewide average of 5.6. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly Black and ranks around the 64th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 1,771 eviction filings here over 8 tracked years, with about 53.0% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 61.5% of renter households in 2011.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 13089023212

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 13089023212?

Census tract 13089023212 in the Hidden Hills neighborhood scores 3.3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 13089023212?

Median gross rent is $1,586/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 29% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 13089023212?

8.1% of residents in tract 13089023212 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,358.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 13089023212?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 64th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 81th, household 5th, minority 98th, housing 67th.
Q5

Is tract 13089023212 considered part of Hidden Hills?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 13089023212 fall within Hidden Hills (neighborhood centroid within 0.6 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 13089023212?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 1,771 eviction filings across 8 validated years in tract 13089023212 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 53.04% of renter households, peaking at 61.5% in 2011. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 13089023212 struggle to pay rent?

About 19.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 12.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 13089023212 compare to Redan overall?

Tract 13089023212 scores 3.3/10, higher than the parent city of Redan at 3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Redan eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Redan

Top eight tracts in Redan ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related