Census Tract · Ranked #59,654 of 84,120 nationally

Great Falls Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 30013002201 · Cascade County, MT · pop 3,244 · 59% of tract blocks fall in Great Falls

Tract 30013002201 sits in Great Falls eviction risk, MT, carrying an eviction-risk score of 3.4/10. Pulling hardest the other way is rent-regulation exposure at 1/10.

Risk score

3.4

Lower

Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale

Household mix · 100 hh

Burdened renters 8% Stable renters 10% Owners 82%

Tract context

Occupied units1,679

Renter share18.9%

SVI overall0.53

Poverty rate13.9%

Median income$65,064

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.

Geographic context

Risk heat across Great Falls and the region

Centroid at 47.4606, -111.2908 · click any tract to drill in

Why Great Falls scores 3.4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly

Local political climate

Inherited from Great Falls

2.5

Regional political climate

2024 county presidential margin

4.0

State political climate

Montana legislature & governorship

1.7

Economic stress

13.9% poverty · this tract

3.5

Supply constraint

$674 rent vs county FMR

1.0

Rent control risk

Inherited from Great Falls

1.0

Eviction process difficulty

State law sets the calendar

2.0

Tenant organizing strength

Inherited from Great Falls

1.5

Housing court bias

Inherited from Great Falls

2.0

How Great Falls compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.

CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 53

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

52%Socioeconomic
29%Household composition
14%Racial/ethnic minority
79%Housing & transportation

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

8.2%Housing insecurity
6.2%Utility-shutoff threat
11.7%Food insecurity
8.5%SNAP enrollment
6.9%Transit barriers
8.6%No health insurance
16.7%Frequent mental distress
35.8%Any disability

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Great Falls

On the softer side, supply constraint reads 1/10. Well under the midpoint, tenant-organizing strength reads 1.5/10.

Average gross rent is $674, 25% below the Great Falls average. 45% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, above the Cascade County average of 37.1%. On the national scale it lands near the 29th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.

Only 19% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 5.7/10. Against average income of $65,064, annual rent is just 12%.

Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the most pressured. It tracks the Cascade County average of 3.5 closely.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 30013002201

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 30013002201?

Census tract 30013002201 in Great Falls scores 3.4/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.

What is the average rent in tract 30013002201?

Median gross rent is $674/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 45% of renter households are cost-burdened.

What is the poverty rate in tract 30013002201?

13.9% of residents in tract 30013002201 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,244.

How socially vulnerable is tract 30013002201?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 53th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 52th, household 29th, minority 14th, housing 79th.

What share of households in tract 30013002201 struggle to pay rent?

About 8.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.

How does tract 30013002201 compare to Great Falls overall?

Tract 30013002201 scores 3.4/10, right in line with the parent city of Great Falls at 3.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Great Falls eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.

Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Great Falls

Top eight tracts in Great Falls ranked by composite eviction-risk score.