Colonial Hills Eviction Risk: Lower , Lincoln
Tract 31109003723 · Lancaster County, NE · pop 4,033 · neighborhood within 0.1 mi
With a score of 3/10, tract 31109003723 in the Colonial Hills area of Lincoln, NE reads lower for landlord eviction risk. Population here is 4,033. The severe-burden share is 38%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Lincoln and the region
Centroid at 40.7625, -96.6348 · click any tract to drill in
Why Colonial Hills scores 3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Colonial Hills compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 2
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 4%Socioeconomic
- 5%Household composition
- 18%Racial/ethnic minority
- 11%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 1%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 5.1%Housing insecurity
- 3.6%Utility-shutoff threat
- 5.6%Food insecurity
- 3.6%SNAP enrollment
- 3.7%Transit barriers
- 5.1%No health insurance
- 11.0%Frequent mental distress
- 21.7%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Colonial Hills
Against Lancaster County at 43.9%, 63% of renters here are cost-burdened. The score leans hardest on supply constraint at 10/10. Average gross rent is $2,044, 88% above the Lincoln average.
The voucher gap is 81.7%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears. Running cool, rent-regulation exposure reads 1/10.
Well under the midpoint, economic stress reads 1.1/10. Food insecurity runs 5.6% against 17.8% nationally. It sits 0.8 points below the Lancaster County average of 3.8.
Inability to pay a utility bill runs 3.6% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground C ("Definitely Declining"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. That is riskier than roughly 20% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.
Only 7% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
About tract 31109003723
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 31109003723?
What is the average rent in tract 31109003723?
What is the poverty rate in tract 31109003723?
How socially vulnerable is tract 31109003723?
Is tract 31109003723 considered part of Colonial Hills?
What share of households in tract 31109003723 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 31109003723 compare to Lincoln overall?
Was tract 31109003723 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Lincoln
Top eight tracts in Lincoln ranked by composite eviction-risk score.