Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #342 of 84,120 nationally

Larkinville Eviction Risk: High , Buffalo

Tract 36029001403 · Erie County, NY · pop 2,127 · neighborhood within 0.7 mi

The Elevated-tier score of $1/10 for census tract 36029001403 reflects conditions in the Larkinville neighborhood of Buffalo, New York. That is riskier than about 94% of US census tracts.

About 43% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 23% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $777 monthly, set against $22,619 in average yearly household income, roughly 41% of income at the averages. Renters make up 82% of occupied homes, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
9.1
High
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 35% Stable renters 47% Owners 18%
Tract context
Occupied units1,128
Renter share82.4%
SVI overall0.97
Poverty rate35.3%
Median income$22,619

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 5 tracts In Larkinville
Very High
Within parent city
97 th percentile
Rank, 97th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 91 tracts In Buffalo
Very High
Within county
97 th percentile
Rank, 97th percentileLowHigh
#8 of 260 tracts In Erie County
Very High
Within state
96 th percentile
Rank, 96th percentileLowHigh
#200 of 5,394 tracts In New York
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Buffalo and the region

Centroid at 42.8823, -78.8615 · click any tract to drill in

Why Larkinville scores 9.1

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Buffalo
8.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.7
State political climate
New York legislature & governorship
7.3
Economic stress
35.3% poverty · this tract
8.8
Supply constraint
$777 rent vs county FMR
1.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Buffalo
7.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
8.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Buffalo
7.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Buffalo
7.5

How Larkinville compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Larkinville risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 9.19.1This tracttract 001403Buffalo: 9.49.4Buffaloparent cityCounty: 6.06.0Countyavg tract in countyState: 5.95.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 97

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Larkinville. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Larkinville

What moves this score most is economic stress at 8.8/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Buffalo eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Erie County average of 6.1 and above the New York statewide average of 6.3. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

This tract overlaps land the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation redlined in the 1930s, a dominant grade of D ("Hazardous") across 53% of the tract. Redlining cut off mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class blocks, and those areas still tend to carry higher rent burden and eviction filings today.

The tract is predominantly Black and ranks around the 97th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 36029001403

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 36029001403?

Census tract 36029001403 in the Larkinville neighborhood scores 9.1/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 36029001403?

Median gross rent is $777/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 43% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 36029001403?

35.3% of residents in tract 36029001403 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,127.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 36029001403?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 97th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 74th, household 99th, minority 96th, housing 93th.
Q5

Is tract 36029001403 considered part of Larkinville?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 36029001403 fall within Larkinville (neighborhood centroid within 0.7 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 36029001403 struggle to pay rent?

About 37.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 30.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 36029001403 compare to Buffalo overall?

Tract 36029001403 scores 9.1/10, lower than the parent city of Buffalo at 9.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Buffalo eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 36029001403 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 53% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Buffalo

Top eight tracts in Buffalo ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related