Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #3,082 of 84,120 nationally

Larkinville Eviction Risk: High , Buffalo

Tract 36029016400 · Erie County, NY · pop 3,153 · neighborhood within 0.5 mi

Tract 36029016400 sits in the Larkinville area of Buffalo eviction risk, NY, carrying an eviction-risk score of 9.3/10. Population here is 3,153. The severe-burden share is 36%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.

Risk score
9.3
High
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 33% Stable renters 40% Owners 27%
Tract context
Occupied units1,697
Renter share73.4%
SVI overall0.91
Poverty rate32.5%
Median income$43,036

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#5 of 5 tracts In Larkinville
Very Low
Within parent city
77 th percentile
Rank, 77th percentileLowHigh
#22 of 91 tracts In Buffalo
High
Within county
93 th percentile
Rank, 93rd percentileLowHigh
#19 of 260 tracts In Erie County
Very High
Within state
72 th percentile
Rank, 72nd percentileLowHigh
#1,493 of 5,394 tracts In New York
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Buffalo and the region

Centroid at 42.8741, -78.8591 · click any tract to drill in

Why Larkinville scores 9.3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Buffalo
8.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.7
State political climate
New York legislature & governorship
7.3
Economic stress
32.5% poverty · this tract
8.1
Supply constraint
$943 rent vs county FMR
3.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Buffalo
7.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
8.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Buffalo
7.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Buffalo
7.5

How Larkinville compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Larkinville risk score vs. parent city / county / state9.3This tracttract 0164007.9Buffaloparent city6.8Countyavg tract in county7.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 91

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Larkinville. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Larkinville

It sits 2.5 points above the Erie County average of 6.8. The poverty rate is 33%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment.

73% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby. What pushes it up most is economic stress at 8.1/10.

Sitting well above the midpoint, local political climate reads 8/10. Running hot, eviction-process difficulty reads 8/10. Housing insecurity runs 26.3% against 14.2% nationally.

Inability to pay a utility bill runs 17.5% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two. Average gross rent is $943, 10% below the Buffalo average.

This ground was mapped D ("Hazardous") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Buffalo. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. Nationally it ranks #3,082 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 9.2/10.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 36029016400

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 36029016400?

Census tract 36029016400 in the Larkinville neighborhood scores 9.3/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 36029016400?

Median gross rent is $943/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 46% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 36029016400?

32.5% of residents in tract 36029016400 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,153.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 36029016400?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 91th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 95th, household 73th, minority 69th, housing 81th.
Q5

Is tract 36029016400 considered part of Larkinville?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 36029016400 fall within Larkinville (neighborhood centroid within 0.5 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 36029016400 struggle to pay rent?

About 26.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 17.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 36029016400 compare to Buffalo overall?

Tract 36029016400 scores 9.3/10, higher than the parent city of Buffalo at 7.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Buffalo eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 36029016400 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 51% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Buffalo

Top eight tracts in Buffalo ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related