Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #550 of 84,120 nationally

Fruit Belt Eviction Risk: High , Buffalo

Tract 36029003501 · Erie County, NY · pop 1,503 · neighborhood within 1.4 mi

The Elevated-tier score of 7.4/10 for census tract 36029003501 reflects conditions in Fruit Belt in Buffalo, New York. That is riskier than about 98% of US census tracts.

67% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 58% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $877 monthly, set against $23,451 in average yearly household income, roughly 45% of income at the averages. About 58% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
8.9
High
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 39% Stable renters 19% Owners 42%
Tract context
Occupied units641
Renter share57.9%
SVI overall0.96
Poverty rate44.1%
Median income$23,451

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
29 th percentile
Rank, 29th percentileLowHigh
#6 of 8 tracts In Fruit Belt
Low
Within parent city
77 th percentile
Rank, 77th percentileLowHigh
#22 of 91 tracts In Buffalo
High
Within county
92 th percentile
Rank, 92nd percentileLowHigh
#23 of 260 tracts In Erie County
Very High
Within state
95 th percentile
Rank, 95th percentileLowHigh
#299 of 5,394 tracts In New York
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Buffalo and the region

Centroid at 42.9088, -78.8295 · click any tract to drill in

Why Fruit Belt scores 8.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Buffalo
8.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.7
State political climate
New York legislature & governorship
7.3
Economic stress
44.1% poverty · this tract
10.0
Supply constraint
$877 rent vs county FMR
2.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Buffalo
7.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
8.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Buffalo
7.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Buffalo
7.5

How Fruit Belt compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Fruit Belt risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 8.98.9This tracttract 003501Buffalo: 9.49.4Buffaloparent cityCounty: 6.06.0Countyavg tract in countyState: 5.95.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 96

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Fruit Belt. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Fruit Belt

The score leans hardest on economic stress at $1/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Buffalo eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Erie County average of 6.1 and above the New York statewide average of 6.3. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly Black and ranks around the 96th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

In CDC survey modeling, about 37.2% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 29.0% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 36029003501

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 36029003501?

Census tract 36029003501 in the Fruit Belt neighborhood scores 8.9/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 36029003501?

Median gross rent is $877/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 67% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 36029003501?

44.1% of residents in tract 36029003501 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,503.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 36029003501?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 96th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 87th, household 97th, minority 98th, housing 85th.
Q5

Is tract 36029003501 considered part of Fruit Belt?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 36029003501 fall within Fruit Belt (neighborhood centroid within 1.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 36029003501 struggle to pay rent?

About 37.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 29.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 36029003501 compare to Buffalo overall?

Tract 36029003501 scores 8.9/10, lower than the parent city of Buffalo at 9.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Buffalo eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 36029003501 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Buffalo

Top eight tracts in Buffalo ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related