Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #37,882 of 84,120 nationally

Dallas Eviction Risk: Moderate

Tract 48113010101 · Dallas, TX · pop 4,212

48113010101 is a census tract in Dallas, TX. It scores 4.7/10 for landlords. Adults with no health insurance runs 33.5% against 11.3% nationally.

Risk score
4.7
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 11% Stable renters 12% Owners 77%
Tract context
Occupied units1,351
Renter share23.2%
SVI overall0.90
Poverty rate14.7%
Median income$45,051

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
63 th percentile
Rank, 63rd percentileLowHigh
#131 of 348 tracts In Dallas
Elevated
Within county
77 th percentile
Rank, 77th percentileLowHigh
#148 of 645 tracts In Dallas
High
Within state
77 th percentile
Rank, 77th percentileLowHigh
#1,569 of 6,884 tracts In Texas
High
National
55 th percentile
Rank, 55th percentileLowHigh
#37,882 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Dallas and the region

Centroid at 32.7878, -96.8488 · click any tract to drill in

Why Dallas scores 4.7

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Dallas
6.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.6
State political climate
Texas legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
14.7% poverty · this tract
3.7
Supply constraint
$1,043 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Dallas
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Dallas
4.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Dallas
3.0

How Dallas compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Dallas risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 4.74.7This tracttract 010101Dallas: 3.73.7Dallasparent cityCounty: 3.83.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.93.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 90

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 1,171Total filings over 18 yrs
  • 14.10%Avg annual filing rate
  • 22.1%Peak (2001)
  • 37Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2000 to 2017
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 481130101012000: 65 filings (13.18/100 renter HHs)2001: 109 filings (22.11/100 renter HHs)2002: 75 filings (15.21/100 renter HHs)2003: 90 filings (18.26/100 renter HHs)2004: 82 filings (16.63/100 renter HHs)2005: 72 filings (18.14/100 renter HHs)2006: 70 filings (17.63/100 renter HHs)2007: 59 filings (14.86/100 renter HHs)2008: 69 filings (17.38/100 renter HHs)2009: 46 filings (11.59/100 renter HHs)2010: 40 filings (7.26/100 renter HHs)2011: 37 filings (8.20/100 renter HHs)2012: 70 filings (15.52/100 renter HHs)2013: 78 filings (17.29/100 renter HHs)2014: 60 filings (13.30/100 renter HHs)2015: 43 filings (9.53/100 renter HHs)2016: 69 filings (11.52/100 renter HHs)2017: 37 filings (6.18/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 43% over the past 18 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 202Total filings 2020-21
  • 2.6Avg monthly (observed)
  • 2.7Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.96×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 3 filings (1.12× baseline)2020-02-01: 2 filings (0.50× baseline)2020-03-01: 2 filings (0.67× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 8 filings (2.67× baseline)2020-07-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2020-08-01: 4 filings (1.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 3 filings (1.12× baseline)2020-10-01: 2 filings (1.50× baseline)2020-11-01: 6 filings (1.63× baseline)2020-12-01: 2 filings (0.60× baseline)2021-01-01: 2 filings (0.75× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 2 filings (0.54× baseline)2021-05-01: 1 filings (0.60× baseline)2021-06-01: 2 filings (0.67× baseline)2021-07-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 2 filings (0.75× baseline)2021-10-01: 2 filings (1.50× baseline)2021-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 1 filings (0.30× baseline)2022-01-01: 2 filings (0.75× baseline)2022-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 4 filings (1.33× baseline)2022-04-01: 1 filings (0.27× baseline)2022-05-01: 6 filings (3.59× baseline)2022-06-01: 7 filings (2.33× baseline)2022-07-01: 4 filings (2.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 2 filings (0.50× baseline)2022-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 2 filings (1.50× baseline)2022-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 1 filings (0.25× baseline)2023-03-01: 4 filings (1.33× baseline)2023-04-01: 5 filings (1.36× baseline)2023-05-01: 3 filings (1.80× baseline)2023-06-01: 3 filings (1.00× baseline)2023-07-01: 5 filings (2.50× baseline)2023-08-01: 3 filings (0.75× baseline)2023-09-01: 3 filings (1.12× baseline)2023-10-01: 3 filings (2.26× baseline)2023-11-01: 6 filings (1.63× baseline)2023-12-01: 1 filings (0.30× baseline)2024-01-01: 4 filings (1.50× baseline)2024-02-01: 3 filings (0.75× baseline)2024-03-01: 3 filings (1.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 1 filings (0.27× baseline)2024-05-01: 3 filings (1.80× baseline)2024-06-01: 3 filings (1.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 3 filings (1.50× baseline)2024-08-01: 5 filings (1.25× baseline)2024-09-01: 9 filings (3.37× baseline)2024-10-01: 2 filings (1.50× baseline)2024-11-01: 3 filings (0.82× baseline)2024-12-01: 1 filings (0.30× baseline)2025-01-01: 4 filings (1.50× baseline)2025-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 2 filings (0.67× baseline)2025-04-01: 4 filings (1.09× baseline)2025-05-01: 10 filings (5.99× baseline)2025-06-01: 4 filings (1.33× baseline)2025-07-01: 4 filings (2.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 2 filings (0.50× baseline)2025-09-01: 4 filings (1.50× baseline)2025-10-01: 3 filings (2.26× baseline)2025-11-01: 1 filings (0.27× baseline)2025-12-01: 5 filings (1.50× baseline)2026-01-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran below baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Dallas, TX as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Dallas

Pulling hardest the other way is rent-regulation exposure at 1/10. Well under the midpoint, supply constraint reads 1/10.

Average gross rent is $1,043, 29% below the Dallas average. On the softer side, state political climate reads 1.5/10.

15% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. It sits 0.9 points above the Dallas County average of 3.8.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 1,171 filings here across 18 tracked years. Filings peaked in 2001 at 22.1% of renter households.

This ground was mapped D ("Hazardous") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Dallas. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. In a typical year about 14.1% of renter households face a filing.

On the national scale it lands near the 55th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 48113010101

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 48113010101?

Census tract 48113010101 in Dallas scores 4.7/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 48113010101?

Median gross rent is $1,043/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 47% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 48113010101?

14.7% of residents in tract 48113010101 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,212.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 48113010101?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 90th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 100th, household 74th, minority 98th, housing 42th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 48113010101?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 1,171 eviction filings across 18 validated years in tract 48113010101 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 14.10% of renter households, peaking at 22.1% in 2001. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

Did eviction filings in tract 48113010101 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.96× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran modestly below normal. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Dallas eviction risk, TX), 2020-2021.
Q7

How does tract 48113010101 compare to Dallas overall?

Tract 48113010101 scores 4.7/10, higher than the parent city of Dallas at 3.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Dallas eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 48113010101 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 30% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Dallas

Top eight tracts in Dallas ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related