Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #82,639 of 84,120 nationally

New Territory Eviction Risk: Lower , Sugar Land

Tract 48157673904 · Fort Bend, TX · pop 5,581 · neighborhood within 0.7 mi

How risky is New Territory in Sugar Land for landlords? Census tract 48157673904 scores 3.5/10, the Lower tier. That is riskier than roughly 5% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

About 0% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a modest level, and 0% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $2,440 a month while the average household earns $157,831 a year, roughly 19% of income at the averages. About 3% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
1.1
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 0% Stable renters 3% Owners 97%
Tract context
Occupied units1,517
Renter share3.4%
SVI overall0.24
Poverty rate3.0%
Median income$157,831

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 4 tracts In New Territory
Very Low
Within parent city
14 th percentile
Rank, 14th percentileLowHigh
#26 of 30 tracts In Sugar Land
Very Low
Within county
8 th percentile
Rank, 8th percentileLowHigh
#122 of 133 tracts In Fort Bend
Very Low
Within state
3 th percentile
Rank, 3rd percentileLowHigh
#6,685 of 6,884 tracts In Texas
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Sugar Land and the region

Centroid at 29.5981, -95.6695 · click any tract to drill in

Why New Territory scores 1.1

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Sugar Land
3.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.5
State political climate
Texas legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
3.0% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$2,440 rent vs county FMR
10.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Sugar Land
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Sugar Land
1.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Sugar Land
2.0

How New Territory compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
New Territory risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 1.11.1This tracttract 673904Sugar Land: 2.32.3Sugar Landparent cityCounty: 2.52.5Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.93.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 24

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within New Territory. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in New Territory

The heaviest input here is supply constraint at $1/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Sugar Land eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Fort Bend County average of 4.8 and below the Texas statewide average of 4.9. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

The tract is White and Asian and ranks around the 24th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

For a landlord, this is among the easier places to operate: faster process, lighter tenant-protection overhead, and shorter typical cases.

Frequently asked

About tract 48157673904

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 48157673904?

Census tract 48157673904 in the New Territory neighborhood scores 1.1/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 48157673904?

Median gross rent is $2,440/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 0% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 48157673904?

3.0% of residents in tract 48157673904 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,581.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 48157673904?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 24th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 19th, household 29th, minority 79th, housing 24th.
Q5

Is tract 48157673904 considered part of New Territory?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 48157673904 fall within New Territory (neighborhood centroid within 0.7 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How does tract 48157673904 compare to Sugar Land overall?

Tract 48157673904 scores 1.1/10, lower than the parent city of Sugar Land at 2.3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Sugar Land eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Sugar Land

Top eight tracts in Sugar Land ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related