Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #63,308 of 84,120 nationally

Continental Village Eviction Risk: Lower , Scottsdale

Tract 04013216833 · Maricopa, AZ · pop 3,949 · neighborhood within 0.5 mi

With a score of 3.2/10, tract 04013216833 in the Continental Village area of Scottsdale, AZ reads lower for landlord eviction risk. It is home to 3,949 residents. The main counterweight is rent-regulation exposure at 1/10.

Risk score
3.2
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 15% Stable renters 16% Owners 69%
Tract context
Occupied units1,893
Renter share30.9%
SVI overall0.10
Poverty rate10.0%
Median income$84,466

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Continental Village
Moderate
Within parent city
82 th percentile
Rank, 82nd percentileLowHigh
#12 of 61 tracts In Scottsdale
High
Within county
46 th percentile
Rank, 46th percentileLowHigh
#544 of 1,009 tracts In Maricopa
Moderate
Within state
44 th percentile
Rank, 44th percentileLowHigh
#983 of 1,765 tracts In Arizona
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across Scottsdale and the region

Centroid at 33.5735, -111.8522 · click any tract to drill in

Why Continental Village scores 3.2

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Scottsdale
2.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.1
State political climate
Arizona legislature & governorship
2.2
Economic stress
10.0% poverty · this tract
2.5
Supply constraint
$1,887 rent vs county FMR
4.7
Rent control risk
Inherited from Scottsdale
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Scottsdale
1.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Scottsdale
2.0

How Continental Village compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Continental Village risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.23.2This tracttract 216833Scottsdale: 3.23.2Scottsdaleparent cityCounty: 3.73.7Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.83.8Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 10

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 360Total filings over 5 yrs
  • 13.00%Avg annual filing rate
  • 16.0%Peak (2003)
  • 29Filings in 2005 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2001 to 2005
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 040132168332001: 80 filings (14.42/100 renter HHs)2002: 79 filings (14.24/100 renter HHs)2003: 89 filings (16.04/100 renter HHs)2004: 83 filings (14.96/100 renter HHs)2005: 29 filings (5.33/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 64% over the past 5 months.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Continental Village

25% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. Running hot, court filing pressure reads 8.9/10.

On the softer side, tenant-organizing strength reads 1.5/10. Housing insecurity runs 5.2% against 14.2% nationally.

Court records carry 360 eviction filings across 5 observed years. Inability to pay a utility bill runs 3.3% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two.

Filings peaked in 2003 at 16.0% of renter households. In a typical year about 13.0% of renter households face a filing.

That is riskier than roughly 25% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. Social vulnerability reads 1.9/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.

Of its three components the household composition measure is the least pressured. about half of renter households spend at least 30% of income on rent. It tracks the Maricopa County average of 3.7 closely.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 04013216833

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 04013216833?

Census tract 04013216833 in the Continental Village neighborhood scores 3.2/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 04013216833?

Median gross rent is $1,887/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 49% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 04013216833?

10.0% of residents in tract 04013216833 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,949.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 04013216833?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 10th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 18th, household 7th, minority 27th, housing 25th.
Q5

Is tract 04013216833 considered part of Continental Village?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 04013216833 fall within Continental Village (neighborhood centroid within 0.5 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 04013216833?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 360 eviction filings across 5 validated years in tract 04013216833 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 13.00% of renter households, peaking at 16.0% in 2003. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 04013216833 struggle to pay rent?

About 5.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 04013216833 compare to Scottsdale overall?

Tract 04013216833 scores 3.2/10, right in line with the parent city of Scottsdale at 3.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Scottsdale eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Scottsdale

Top eight tracts in Scottsdale ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related