Census Tract · Ranked #5,730 of 84,120 nationally

Foothill Farms Eviction Risk: High

Tract 06067007501 · Sacramento, CA · pop 7,559 · 56% of tract blocks fall in Foothill Farms

06067007501 is a census tract in Foothill Farms, CA. It scores 8.4/10 for landlords. It is home to 7,559 residents. Severe burden reaches 35%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.

Risk score

8.4

High

Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale

Household mix · 100 hh

Burdened renters 43% Stable renters 26% Owners 31%

Tract context

Occupied units2,822

Renter share69.2%

SVI overall0.81

Poverty rate21.1%

Median income$53,598

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.

Geographic context

Risk heat across Foothill Farms and the region

Centroid at 38.6687, -121.3443 · click any tract to drill in

Why Foothill Farms scores 8.4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly

Local political climate

Inherited from Foothill Farms

6.6

Regional political climate

2024 county presidential margin

6.3

State political climate

California legislature & governorship

6.8

Economic stress

21.1% poverty · this tract

5.3

Supply constraint

$1,479 rent vs county FMR

1.7

Rent control risk

Inherited from Foothill Farms

8.5

Eviction process difficulty

State law sets the calendar

6.7

Tenant organizing strength

Inherited from Foothill Farms

9.0

Housing court bias

Inherited from Foothill Farms

7.9

How Foothill Farms compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.

CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 81

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

74%Socioeconomic
78%Household composition
56%Racial/ethnic minority
81%Housing & transportation

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

16.4%Housing insecurity
10.0%Utility-shutoff threat
18.6%Food insecurity
21.0%SNAP enrollment
11.2%Transit barriers
8.7%No health insurance
20.6%Frequent mental distress
34.6%Any disability

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Foothill Farms

The dominant input is tenant-organizing strength at 9/10. Cost burden runs 62% here against 50.2% across Sacramento County.

Set annual rent against average income of $53,598 and the ratio lands at 33%, above the conventional 30% ceiling. On the high side, rent-regulation exposure reads 8.5/10.

69% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby. Well under the midpoint, supply constraint reads 1.7/10. It sits 1.3 points above the Sacramento County average of 7.1.

The poverty rate is 21%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment. At $1,479 a month, rents run 13% under what the rest of Foothill Farms commands. That is riskier than roughly 93% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.

Social vulnerability reads 8.3/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 0.9 points hotter.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 06067007501

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06067007501?

Census tract 06067007501 in Foothill Farms scores 8.4/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.

What is the average rent in tract 06067007501?

Median gross rent is $1,479/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 62% of renter households are cost-burdened.

What is the poverty rate in tract 06067007501?

21.1% of residents in tract 06067007501 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 7,559.

How socially vulnerable is tract 06067007501?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 81th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 74th, household 78th, minority 56th, housing 81th.

What share of households in tract 06067007501 struggle to pay rent?

About 16.4% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 10.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.

How does tract 06067007501 compare to Foothill Farms overall?

Tract 06067007501 scores 8.4/10, higher than the parent city of Foothill Farms at 7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Foothill Farms; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.

Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Foothill Farms

Top eight tracts in Foothill Farms ranked by composite eviction-risk score.