Skip to content
Bonanza Mountain Estates, Colorado eviction risk overview
City brief · 56 residents

Bonanza Mountain Estates, CO Eviction Risk: LOW

Gilpin County · Population 56

In 2026
Risk score
3.9
LOW

18th percentile, Colorado.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min1.4 Average2.3 Now3.9
5.1 1.4 1976 · score 1.7 1977 · score 1.7 1978 · score 1.7 1979 · score 1.6 1980 · score 1.7 1981 · score 1.4 1982 · score 1.5 1983 · score 1.5 1984 · score 1.4 1985 · score 1.4 1986 · score 1.5 1987 · score 1.5 1988 · score 1.5 1989 · score 1.5 1990 · score 1.5 1991 · score 1.5 1992 · score 1.9 1993 · score 1.8 1994 · score 1.8 1995 · score 1.9 1996 · score 1.8 1997 · score 1.8 1998 · score 1.7 1999 · score 1.7 2000 · score 1.7 2001 · score 1.7 2002 · score 1.8 2003 · score 1.9 2004 · score 2.0 2005 · score 2.0 2006 · score 2.0 2007 · score 2.1 2008 · score 2.6 2009 · score 2.9 2010 · score 3.0 2011 · score 3.0 2012 · score 2.9 2013 · score 2.8 2014 · score 2.8 2015 · score 2.7 2016 · score 2.7 2017 · score 2.7 2018 · score 2.8 2019 · score 2.8 2020 · score 4.8 2021 · score 5.1 2022 · score 4.1 2023 · score 3.8 2024 · score 4.0 2025 · score 3.9 2026 · score 3.9

Key metrics

Estimated values: The U.S. Census suppresses field-level data for small places. Estimated from county average, pop-weighted from real underlying ACS data.
Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 5.9 Regional 5.9 State 4.7 Economic 1.0 Supply 1.0 Rent Control 3.6 Eviction 4.2 Tenant 1.0 Housing 3.1 3.9 LOW
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    Dem margin +12.7% (2024)
    5.9
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    5.9
  3. State political climate
    Colorado legislature & governorship
    4.7
  4. Economic stress
    10.7% poverty · 3.2% unemp.
    1.0
  5. Supply constraint
    $1,521 average · 29.0% renters
    1.0
  6. Rent Control risk
    27.0% of income on rent
    3.6
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    99 days filing → judgment
    4.2
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    29.0% renters
    1.0
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    3.1
Geographic context

Risk heat across Bonanza Mountain Estates and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Bonanza Mountain Estates compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Gilpin County
Very Low
#7 of 7 cities
Rank in county, 0th percentileLowHigh
#7 of 7 cities in Gilpin County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Colorado
Very Low
#395 of 479 cities
Rank in state, 18th percentileLowHigh
#395 of 479 cities in Colorado for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Bonanza Mountain Estates risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Bonanza Mountain E: 3.93.9Bonanza Mountain EThis cityCounty: 4.44.4Countyavg in countyState: 4.84.8Stateavg in stateU.S.: 4.74.7U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 3.9
    / 10 · LOW
    The verdict

    A Low-tier market.

    Composite 3.9/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a sharp climb.

    50-yr trend+2.2 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steepening since 2010 · COVID inflection visible

  2. 99d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $1,521/mo. A contested eviction takes 99 days and costs $4,360–$12,969 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 29.0%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 56 residents, 29.0% rent. 27% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 10.7% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 5.9
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Mid-range climate. Not a coastal market.

    Local & regional political climate score 5.9 and 5.9 (Dem margin +12.7% (2024)). State climate at 4.7, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 4.7
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 4.7/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 4.2, housing court bias 3.1, rent-control risk 3.6. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +-0.8 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 1
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 1. Supply constraint: 1. The numbers behind those: 10.7% poverty, 3.2% unemployment, 27% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Bonanza Mountain Estates sits in the slow & expensive quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Denver, CO · 98d · ~$8.6k all-in ($88/day) · score 5.7 Denver Aurora, CO · 94d · ~$9.3k all-in ($99/day) · score 5.4 Aurora Fort Collins, CO · 106d · ~$9.0k all-in ($85/day) · score 5.4 Fort Collins Lakewood, CO · 91d · ~$8.7k all-in ($96/day) · score 5.2 Lakewood Thornton, CO · 98d · ~$7.9k all-in ($80/day) · score 4.5 Thornton Arvada, CO · 109d · ~$8.2k all-in ($75/day) · score 4.5 Arvada Westminster, CO · 99d · ~$7.3k all-in ($74/day) · score 4.4 Westminster Greeley, CO · 105d · ~$8.0k all-in ($76/day) · score 4.6 Greeley Centennial, CO · 93d · ~$8.6k all-in ($93/day) · score 4.5 Centennial Boulder, CO · 100d · ~$8.9k all-in ($89/day) · score 5.8 Boulder Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.8 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 2.8 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 3.1 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 3.4 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 7.1 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 5.7 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.7 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 7.9 Seattle Bonanza Mountain Estates
Bonanza Mountain Estates · 99d · ~$8.7k all-in ($88/day) · score 3.9 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0–4   4–7   7–10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Bonanza Mountain Estates, CO

Landlording in Bonanza Mountain Estates, Colorado, presents a manageable operating environment for documented landlords. The Eviction Risk Score is 3.9/10 (LOW tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Mid-tier market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Bonanza Mountain Estates is a city of 56 residents where 29.0% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 27.0% of income on rent. At an average rent of $1,521/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Bonanza Mountain Estates eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 4.2/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Bonanza Mountain Estates closes 99 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Bonanza Mountain Estates's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 3.1/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Bonanza Mountain Estates runs $4,360 to $12,969 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 99 days of typical timeline and $1,521/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 1/10 in Bonanza Mountain Estates, and the city has limited rent control exposure (3.6/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Colorado, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Bonanza Mountain Estates: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a LOW tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Colorado's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $12,969 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Bonanza Mountain Estates

Trap · D+9.3
Bonanza Mountain Estates reflects the demographic and political composition of Gilpin County, with eviction procedure governed at the state level. Gilpin County 2020 margin: D+9.3.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

Can I evict a tenant in Bonanza Mountain Estates for being late on rent just once?

Yes, if they don't pay after you've served them a proper 10-day pay-or-quit notice. Colorado law allows you to begin eviction proceedings for non-payment of rent, regardless of how many times they've been late before, as long as the current payment is overdue and the notice period has passed.

Q2

Is there rent control in Bonanza Mountain Estates or Colorado?

No, there is no rent control in Bonanza Mountain Estates or anywhere else in Colorado. Landlords are generally free to set rent prices and increase them as market conditions dictate, provided they give proper notice for increases according to the lease and state law. Check our Colorado rent control rules for more details.

Q3

How long does a tenant have to move out after a judge orders an eviction?

Once a judge issues an order for possession, the tenant typically has a short window, often 48 hours or a few days, to vacate. If they don't leave, you'll need to coordinate with the sheriff's office to schedule a physical lockout. Do not attempt to remove the tenant or their belongings yourself.

Q4

Can I keep a tenant's security deposit for normal wear and tear?

No. You can only deduct from a security deposit for actual damages beyond normal wear and tear, unpaid rent, or cleaning costs if the property isn't left in a reasonably clean condition. Documenting the property's condition before and after tenancy is crucial to avoid disputes.

Q5

Do I have to accept Section 8 tenants in Bonanza Mountain Estates?

Yes. Colorado has a statewide source-of-income protection law. This means you cannot refuse to rent to a tenant simply because they use a Section 8 voucher or other lawful forms of income to pay rent. You must treat them like any other applicant, applying your standard screening criteria. Learn more on our Colorado tenant protections page.

06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 3.9/10 places Bonanza Mountain Estates in the 18th percentile of Colorado cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has risen sharply since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.