Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #61,757 of 84,120 nationally

Black Horse Run Eviction Risk: Lower , Durham

Tract 37063002100 · Durham County, NC · pop 9,548 · neighborhood within 1.0 mi

Landlord eviction risk in census tract 37063002100 (the Black Horse Run area of Durham, North Carolina) comes in at 6.1/10, the Elevated tier. On the national scale it ranks #19,284 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

54% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 11% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average household income is about $103,814 a year. About 5% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
2.8
Lower
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 2% Stable renters 2% Owners 96%
Tract context
Occupied units2,661
Renter share4.6%
SVI overall0.41
Poverty rate6.5%
Median income$103,814

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Black Horse Run
Moderate
Within parent city
20 th percentile
Rank, 20th percentileLowHigh
#56 of 70 tracts In Durham
Low
Within county
19 th percentile
Rank, 19th percentileLowHigh
#55 of 68 tracts In Durham County
Very Low
Within state
26 th percentile
Rank, 26th percentileLowHigh
#1,960 of 2,660 tracts In North Carolina
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Durham and the region

Centroid at 36.1826, -78.8798 · click any tract to drill in

Why Black Horse Run scores 2.8

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Durham
7.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.1
State political climate
North Carolina legislature & governorship
2.3
Economic stress
6.5% poverty · this tract
1.6
Supply constraint
tract rent vs county FMR
5.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Durham
2.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Durham
6.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Durham
4.5

How Black Horse Run compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Black Horse Run risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 2.82.8This tracttract 002100Durham: 3.43.4Durhamparent cityCounty: 3.83.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.83.8Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 41

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 229Total filings over 11 yrs
  • 7.86%Avg annual filing rate
  • 12.7%Peak (2013)
  • 17Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2005 to 2017
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 370630021002005: 9 filings (2.74/100 renter HHs)2006: 30 filings (9.12/100 renter HHs)2009: 19 filings (5.78/100 renter HHs)2010: 26 filings (7.76/100 renter HHs)2011: 29 filings (11.89/100 renter HHs)2012: 27 filings (11.07/100 renter HHs)2013: 31 filings (12.70/100 renter HHs)2014: 22 filings (9.02/100 renter HHs)2015: 13 filings (5.33/100 renter HHs)2016: 6 filings (2.88/100 renter HHs)2017: 17 filings (8.17/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 89% over the past 11 months.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Black Horse Run

The heaviest input here is tenant organizing strength at 6.5/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Durham eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Durham County average of 5.9 and above the North Carolina statewide average of 5.3. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 11.4% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 7.6% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 41st percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 37063002100

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 37063002100?

Census tract 37063002100 in the Black Horse Run neighborhood scores 2.8/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the poverty rate in tract 37063002100?

6.5% of residents in tract 37063002100 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 9,548.
Q3

How socially vulnerable is tract 37063002100?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 41th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 40th, household 30th, minority 54th, housing 49th.
Q4

Is tract 37063002100 considered part of Black Horse Run?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 37063002100 fall within Black Horse Run (neighborhood centroid within 1.0 miles, OSM data).
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 37063002100?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 229 eviction filings across 11 validated years in tract 37063002100 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 7.86% of renter households, peaking at 12.7% in 2013. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

What share of households in tract 37063002100 struggle to pay rent?

About 11.4% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 7.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 37063002100 compare to Durham overall?

Tract 37063002100 scores 2.8/10, lower than the parent city of Durham at 3.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Durham eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Durham

Top eight tracts in Durham ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related