Skip to content
Neighborhood · Durham, NC

Kitts Creek Eviction Risk: Lower

1 census tracts · pop 6,192 · pop-weighted Eviction Risk Score 3.1/10 · range 3.1–3.1

Kitts Creek maps to a single census tract in Durham, NC, population 6,192. Scored across those inputs it reaches 3.1/10, placing it in the Lower tier. Against a Durham baseline of 29.4%, 46% of renters here cross the 30%-of-income line.

Pulling the other way is economic stress, at 1/10. This is a renter market: 74% of occupied units are tenant-occupied. Well under the midpoint is rent-regulation exposure, at 2/10.

The severe-burden share is 13%. Those renters are past the 50% mark, and they miss rent for reasons that have nothing to do with willingness to pay. Disability prevalence reaches 18.4% against a 31.5% national average, which raises the odds a reasonable-accommodation request accompanies any dispute. Food insecurity affects 8.5% of adults, 9.3 points below the national rate.

At $1,640 a month, rents sit 9% over what the rest of Durham commands. That places it #41 of 58 neighborhoods in Durham.

For a like-for-like read, Woodcroft and 55 at the Park score within a fraction of it. Poverty sits at 2%, low enough that arrears here usually reflect a specific shock rather than a structural income gap.

Annual rent works out to 24% of average household income of $81,647.

Because the boundary contains one tract, 3.1/10 is simultaneously the area figure and the address-level figure. Scores move when the ACS release, the court-record feed, or the statute ledger behind them moves.

Risk score
3.1
Lower
1 tracts · population-weighted
Kitts Creek vs Durham How this neighborhood stacks against the citywide average
% of income on rent
45.6% +55%
Durham: 29.4%
Average gross rent
$1,640 +9%
Durham: $1,508
Average HH income
$81,647 +3%
Durham: $79,234
Poverty rate
2.2% -82%
Durham: 12.2%
Renter share
73.5% +54%
Durham: 47.7%
Peer neighborhoods

Neighborhoods with similar eviction risk

Same county, closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Geographic context

Risk heat across Kitts Creek and the region

Click any tract to drill in · 1 tracts span score 3.1–3.1

Why Kitts Creek scores 3.1

9 axes · pop-weighted · 1 = landlord-friendly
State political climate
legislature & governorship · Range 2.3–2.3 across tracts
2.3
Regional political climate
County-level mix · 2024 presidential margin · Range 8.1–8.1 across tracts
8.1
Local political climate
Parent city governance · Range 7.5–7.5 across tracts
7.5
Rent control risk
46% of income on rent · Range 2.0–2.0 across tracts
2.0
Eviction process difficulty
State notice requirements & court backlog · Range 4.5–4.5 across tracts
4.5
Tenant organizing strength
74% renter households · Range 6.5–6.5 across tracts
6.5
Housing court bias
County bench composition · Range 4.5–4.5 across tracts
4.5
Economic stress
2.2% below poverty line · Range 1.0–1.0 across tracts
1.0
Supply constraint
Rent-to-FMR gap & zoning friction · Range 3.8–3.8 across tracts
3.8
Risk score comparison

Kitts Creek vs. parent city, state, U.S.

Eviction Risk Score (0–10 scale).

Kitts Creek score vs. parent city, state, U.S.3.1Kitts CreekNeighborhood4.0Parent cityhost city3.9Stateavg in state5.1U.S.national avgU.S. avg = 5.0
Census tracts

1 tracts in Kitts Creek

Ranked highest-risk first. Click for per-tract detail.

Tract↕ Score↕ Pop↕ % over 30% on rent↕ Average rent↕
37063002037 3.1 6,192 46% $1,640
Social Vulnerability Index

CDC SVI percentile: 30

Pop-weighted across 1 tracts. Higher = more vulnerable to disaster, displacement, and rent shocks. Source: CDC/ATSDR SVI 2022.

Socioeconomic status 32%ile
Poverty, unemployment, no-HS-diploma, housing cost burden
Household characteristics 7%ile
Single-parent HH, disability, language barriers, age 17- / 65+
Racial/ethnic minority 75%ile
Hispanic + non-white share of population
Housing & transport 50%ile
Multi-unit structures, mobile homes, crowding, no vehicle
CDC PLACES 2023 · pop-weighted

Eviction-adjacent indicators in Kitts Creek

Average across all constituent tracts, population-weighted. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh) crude prevalence.

Frequently asked

About Kitts Creek

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for Kitts Creek?

Kitts Creek scores 3.1/10 (Lower tier) across 1 census tracts. The pop-weighted Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income and poverty signals.
Q2

How does Kitts Creek compare to Durham overall?

Kitts Creek scores 0.9 points lower than Durham overall (4/10). Renters spend 46% of income on rent vs 29% citywide. Average rent: $1,640 vs $1,508.
Q3

What is the average rent in Kitts Creek?

Average gross rent in Kitts Creek is $1,640/month (pop-weighted across 1 census tracts, ACS 5-year 2023). 46% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q4

What percentage of Kitts Creek residents are renters?

74% of Kitts Creek households are renter-occupied (vs 48% in Durham). The neighborhood has 6,192 residents.
Q5

Is Kitts Creek a high social-vulnerability area?

Kitts Creek sits in the 30th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index (less vulnerable). The index combines poverty, unemployment, household composition, racial/ethnic minority share, and housing/transportation factors across all US census tracts.
Q6

How safe is Kitts Creek for landlords?

Kitts Creek carries a lower-tier eviction-risk profile for landlords (3.1/10). Pop-weighted across 1 constituent tracts, the score blends parent-city rent-control posture, county eviction-process timelines, and tract-specific rent-to-income / poverty signals. Compared to Durham as a whole (4/10), this neighborhood is lower-risk.
Q7

What is the demographic breakdown of Kitts Creek?

Kitts Creek has 6,377 residents. Top groups: White (non-Hispanic) (42%), Black (non-Hispanic) (30.4%), Asian (non-Hispanic) (21.4%). Source: ACS 5-year 2023, table B03002.
Nearby

Other neighborhoods near Kitts Creek

Sibling neighborhoods

Other neighborhoods inside Durham

Same parent city, ranked by score similarity to Kitts Creek.

Zoom out

Up the geography chain · or explore further