Shadow Hills Eviction Risk: Lower , Catalina Foothills
Tract 04019004726 · Pima, AZ · pop 3,926 · neighborhood within 0.5 mi
Tract 04019004726 sits in the Shadow Hills area of Catalina Foothills eviction risk, AZ, carrying an eviction-risk score of 3/10. Population here is 3,926. Against Pima County at 43.8%, 18% of renters here are cost-burdened.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Catalina Foothills and the region
Centroid at 32.3088, -110.9476 · click any tract to drill in
Why Shadow Hills scores 3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Shadow Hills compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 14
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 2%Socioeconomic
- 41%Household composition
- 42%Racial/ethnic minority
- 36%Housing & transportation
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 60Total filings over 11 yrs
- 1.02%Avg annual filing rate
- 1.1%Peak (2005)
- 2Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Shadow Hills. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 3.5%Housing insecurity
- 2.6%Utility-shutoff threat
- 4.0%Food insecurity
- 2.4%SNAP enrollment
- 3.2%Transit barriers
- 4.0%No health insurance
- 10.3%Frequent mental distress
- 24.4%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Shadow Hills
The main counterweight is economic stress at 1/10. Average gross rent is $967, 32% below the Catalina Foothills average. On the high side, court filing pressure reads 8.4/10.
Running cool, eviction-process difficulty reads 1.7/10. It sits 0.9 points below the Pima County average of 3.9.
Court records carry 60 eviction filings across 11 observed years. Adults with no health insurance runs 4.0% against 11.3% nationally.
Inability to pay a utility bill runs 2.6% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two. The worst year on record was 2005, when 1.1% of renter households were served.
In a typical year about 1.0% of renter households face a filing. That is riskier than roughly 20% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.
At 9% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out. Social vulnerability reads 2.3/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
About tract 04019004726
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 04019004726?
What is the average rent in tract 04019004726?
What is the poverty rate in tract 04019004726?
How socially vulnerable is tract 04019004726?
Is tract 04019004726 considered part of Shadow Hills?
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 04019004726?
What share of households in tract 04019004726 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 04019004726 compare to Catalina Foothills overall?
Highest-risk tracts in Catalina Foothills
Top eight tracts in Catalina Foothills ranked by composite eviction-risk score.