41% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 27% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,645 monthly, set against $63,676 in average yearly household income, roughly 31% of income at the averages. About 61% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.
Risk score
5.3
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 25%Stable renters 36%Owners 39%
Tract context
Occupied units886
Renter share61.1%
SVI overall0.92
Poverty rate18.5%
Median income$63,676
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
75th percentile
#2 of 5 tracts In South Common Historic District
High
Within parent city
56th percentile
#12 of 26 tracts In Lowell
Elevated
Within county
92th percentile
#30 of 357 tracts In Middlesex County
Very High
Within state
81th percentile
#302 of 1,613 tracts In Massachusetts
High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Lowell and the region
Centroid at 42.6349, -71.3075 · click any tract to drill in
Why South Common Historic District scores 5.3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Lowell
6.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.3
State political climate
Massachusetts legislature & governorship
6.2
Economic stress
18.5% poverty · this tract
4.6
Supply constraint
$1,645 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Lowell
5.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Lowell
6.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Lowell
6.5
How South Common Historic District compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 92
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
92%Socioeconomic
94%Household composition
72%Racial/ethnic minority
70%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
242Total filings over 5 yrs
7.53%Avg annual filing rate
7.9%Peak (2014)
49Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year2012 to 2016
Filings climbed 20% over the past 5 months.
Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)
0Total filings 2020-21
0.0Avg monthly (observed)
0.0Pre-pandemic baseline
0.00×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–20212020-01-01 to 2023-11-01
Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Boston, MA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within South Common Historic District. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
21.7%Housing insecurity
12.5%Utility-shutoff threat
25.9%Food insecurity
28.6%SNAP enrollment
14.8%Transit barriers
11.5%No health insurance
20.6%Frequent mental distress
35.2%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in South Common Historic District
What moves this score most is eviction process difficulty at 6.5/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Lowell eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Middlesex County average of 5.2 and below the Massachusetts statewide average of 5.9. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
The tract is White and Hispanic or Latino and ranks around the 92nd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.
In CDC survey modeling, about 21.7% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 12.5% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 25017312000
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 25017312000?
Census tract 25017312000 in the South Common Historic District neighborhood scores 5.3/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 25017312000?
Median gross rent is $1,645/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 41% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 25017312000?
18.5% of residents in tract 25017312000 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,046.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 25017312000?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 92th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 92th, household 94th, minority 72th, housing 70th.
Q5
Is tract 25017312000 considered part of South Common Historic District?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 25017312000 fall within South Common Historic District (neighborhood centroid within 0.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 25017312000?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 242 eviction filings across 5 validated years in tract 25017312000 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 7.53% of renter households, peaking at 7.9% in 2014. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 25017312000 struggle to pay rent?
About 21.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 12.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 25017312000 compare to Lowell overall?
Tract 25017312000 scores 5.3/10, lower than the parent city of Lowell at 6.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Lowell eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Lowell
Top eight tracts in Lowell ranked by composite eviction-risk score.