Colonial Village Eviction Risk: Lower , Durham
Tract 37063000101 · Durham County, NC · pop 3,845 · neighborhood within 0.1 mi
37063000101 is a census tract in the Colonial Village area of Durham, NC. It scores 3.9/10 for landlords. It is home to 3,845 residents. The score leans hardest on court filing pressure at 9.4/10.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Durham and the region
Centroid at 36.0264, -78.8822 · click any tract to drill in
Why Colonial Village scores 3.9
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Colonial Village compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 54
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 64%Socioeconomic
- 43%Household composition
- 78%Racial/ethnic minority
- 30%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 13%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 1,509Total filings over 11 yrs
- 29.13%Avg annual filing rate
- 44.2%Peak (2006)
- 80Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 15.5%Housing insecurity
- 9.9%Utility-shutoff threat
- 17.6%Food insecurity
- 14.1%SNAP enrollment
- 9.6%Transit barriers
- 12.2%No health insurance
- 16.6%Frequent mental distress
- 29.5%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Colonial Village
Cost burden runs 58% here against 43.8% across Durham County. 27% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.
Running hot, regional political climate reads 8.1/10. On the softer side, rent-regulation exposure reads 2/10. Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 1,509 filings here across 11 tracked years.
The worst year on record was 2006, when 44.2% of renter households were served. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground C ("Definitely Declining"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.
In a typical year about 29.1% of renter households face a filing. On the national scale it lands near the 40th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.
Social vulnerability reads 5.9/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. It tracks the Durham County average of 4.1 closely.
Average gross rent is $1,392, close to the Durham average. Annual rent works out to 19% of average household income of $87,446. 25% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
About tract 37063000101
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 37063000101?
What is the average rent in tract 37063000101?
What is the poverty rate in tract 37063000101?
How socially vulnerable is tract 37063000101?
Is tract 37063000101 considered part of Colonial Village?
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 37063000101?
What share of households in tract 37063000101 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 37063000101 compare to Durham overall?
Was tract 37063000101 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Durham
Top eight tracts in Durham ranked by composite eviction-risk score.