Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally

Greatwood Eviction Risk: Lower , Sugar Land

Tract 48157674603 · Fort Bend, TX · pop 6,366 · neighborhood within 1.1 mi

With a score of 3/10, tract 48157674603 in the Greatwood area of Sugar Land, TX reads lower for landlord eviction risk. Population here is 6,366. The voucher gap is 36.5%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears.

Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 10% Stable renters 15% Owners 75%
Tract context
Occupied units2,140
Renter share24.6%
SVI overall0.24
Poverty rate4.3%
Median income$120,577

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 3 tracts In Greatwood
Moderate
Within parent city
7 th percentile
Rank, 7th percentileLowHigh
#28 of 30 tracts In Sugar Land
Very Low
Within county
27 th percentile
Rank, 27th percentileLowHigh
#97 of 133 tracts In Fort Bend
Low
Within state
35 th percentile
Rank, 35th percentileLowHigh
#4,505 of 6,884 tracts In Texas
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Sugar Land and the region

Centroid at 29.5446, -95.6907 · click any tract to drill in

Why Greatwood scores 3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Sugar Land
3.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.5
State political climate
Texas legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
4.3% poverty · this tract
1.1
Supply constraint
$2,087 rent vs county FMR
8.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Sugar Land
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Sugar Land
1.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Sugar Land
2.0

How Greatwood compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Greatwood risk score vs. parent city / county / state3.0This tracttract 6746033.2Sugar Landparent city3.8Countyavg tract in county3.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 24

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 310Total filings over 14 yrs
  • 14.09%Avg annual filing rate
  • 6.7%Peak (2016)
  • 32Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2003 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 48157674603
Filings climbed 256% over the past 14 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Greatwood. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Greatwood

The main counterweight is rent-regulation exposure at 1/10. On the softer side, economic stress reads 1.1/10.

Running hot, supply constraint reads 8.6/10. The filing record is not thin: 310 evictions over 14 years of observation. Against Fort Bend County at 42.8%, 39% of renters here are cost-burdened.

It sits 0.8 points below the Fort Bend County average of 3.8. The worst year on record was 2016, when 6.7% of renter households were served.

In a typical year about 14.1% of renter households face a filing. Nationally it ranks #67,219 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. Only 25% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices.

CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 3.2/10. Statewide the TX average is 3.9, so this tract runs 0.9 points cooler.

Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the least pressured. Poverty sits at 4%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap. Average gross rent is $2,087, close to the Sugar Land average.

Annual rent works out to 21% of average household income of $120,577.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 48157674603

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 48157674603?

Census tract 48157674603 in the Greatwood neighborhood scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 48157674603?

Median gross rent is $2,087/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 39% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 48157674603?

4.3% of residents in tract 48157674603 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 6,366.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 48157674603?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 24th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 34th, household 28th, minority 66th, housing 13th.
Q5

Is tract 48157674603 considered part of Greatwood?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 48157674603 fall within Greatwood (neighborhood centroid within 1.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 48157674603?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 310 eviction filings across 14 validated years in tract 48157674603 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 14.09% of renter households, peaking at 6.7% in 2016. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

How does tract 48157674603 compare to Sugar Land overall?

Tract 48157674603 scores 3/10, right in line with the parent city of Sugar Land at 3.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Sugar Land eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Sugar Land

Top eight tracts in Sugar Land ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related