Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #47,371 of 84,120 nationally

Silvercroft Eviction Risk: Moderate , Tucson

Tract 04019004413 · Pima, AZ · pop 3,280 · neighborhood within 1.3 mi

With a score of 4.1/10, tract 04019004413 in the Silvercroft area of Tucson, AZ reads moderate for landlord eviction risk. Cost burden runs 27% here against 43.8% across Pima County.

Risk score
4.1
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 3% Stable renters 9% Owners 88%
Tract context
Occupied units1,517
Renter share12.9%
SVI overall0.50
Poverty rate17.6%
Median income$78,385

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 3 tracts In Silvercroft
Moderate
Within parent city
38 th percentile
Rank, 38th percentileLowHigh
#89 of 143 tracts In Tucson
Low
Within county
61 th percentile
Rank, 61st percentileLowHigh
#106 of 270 tracts In Pima
Elevated
Within state
66 th percentile
Rank, 66th percentileLowHigh
#599 of 1,765 tracts In Arizona
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Tucson and the region

Centroid at 32.2431, -111.0297 · click any tract to drill in

Why Silvercroft scores 4.1

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Tucson
7.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.9
State political climate
Arizona legislature & governorship
2.2
Economic stress
17.6% poverty · this tract
4.4
Supply constraint
$1,461 rent vs county FMR
5.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Tucson
1.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Tucson
5.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Tucson
4.5

How Silvercroft compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Silvercroft risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 4.14.1This tracttract 004413Tucson: 3.83.8Tucsonparent cityCounty: 3.93.9Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.83.8Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 50

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 74Total filings over 12 yrs
  • 2.60%Avg annual filing rate
  • 5.2%Peak (2013)
  • 3Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2004 to 2017
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 040190044132004: 5 filings (4.50/100 renter HHs)2005: 3 filings (1.30/100 renter HHs)2006: 3 filings (1.30/100 renter HHs)2007: 3 filings (1.30/100 renter HHs)2008: 8 filings (3.48/100 renter HHs)2009: 6 filings (2.61/100 renter HHs)2010: 7 filings (3.93/100 renter HHs)2011: 10 filings (3.27/100 renter HHs)2012: 4 filings (1.31/100 renter HHs)2013: 16 filings (5.23/100 renter HHs)2016: 6 filings (1.99/100 renter HHs)2017: 3 filings (1.00/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 40% over the past 12 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Silvercroft. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Silvercroft

The clearest offset is rent-regulation exposure at 1.5/10. Running hot, court filing pressure reads 8.4/10. Average gross rent is $1,461, 28% above the Tucson average.

Running cool, state political climate reads 2.2/10. SNAP participation runs 6.2% against 15.2% nationally. The filing record is not thin: 74 evictions over 12 years of observation.

Food insecurity runs 9.6% against 17.8% nationally. 8% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.

Filings peaked in 2013 at 5.2% of renter households. In a typical year about 2.6% of renter households face a filing.

On the national scale it lands near the 44th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. Only 13% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices.

On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 5.5/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the least pressured.

It tracks the Pima County average of 3.9 closely.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 04019004413

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 04019004413?

Census tract 04019004413 in the Silvercroft neighborhood scores 4.1/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 04019004413?

Median gross rent is $1,461/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 27% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 04019004413?

17.6% of residents in tract 04019004413 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,280.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 04019004413?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 50th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 68th, household 55th, minority 62th, housing 17th.
Q5

Is tract 04019004413 considered part of Silvercroft?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 04019004413 fall within Silvercroft (neighborhood centroid within 1.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 04019004413?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 74 eviction filings across 12 validated years in tract 04019004413 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 2.60% of renter households, peaking at 5.2% in 2013. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 04019004413 struggle to pay rent?

About 8.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 04019004413 compare to Tucson overall?

Tract 04019004413 scores 4.1/10, higher than the parent city of Tucson at 3.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Tucson eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Tucson

Top eight tracts in Tucson ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related