Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #71,178 of 84,120 nationally

North Richland Hills Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 48439113216 · Tarrant, TX · pop 5,101

The Moderate-tier score of 5.6/10 for census tract 48439113216 reflects conditions in North Richland Hills, Texas. That is riskier than roughly 59% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

48% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 9% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,871 a month while the average household earns $76,653 a year, roughly 29% of income at the averages. About 51% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
2.2
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 25% Stable renters 27% Owners 48%
Tract context
Occupied units2,404
Renter share51.4%
SVI overall0.32
Poverty rate3.3%
Median income$76,653

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
31 th percentile
Rank, 31st percentileLowHigh
#10 of 14 tracts In North Richland Hills
Low
Within county
21 th percentile
Rank, 21st percentileLowHigh
#354 of 449 tracts In Tarrant
Low
Within state
15 th percentile
Rank, 15th percentileLowHigh
#5,833 of 6,884 tracts In Texas
Very Low
National
15 th percentile
Rank, 15th percentileLowHigh
#71,178 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across North Richland Hills and the region

Centroid at 32.8538, -97.2277 · click any tract to drill in

Why North Richland Hills scores 2.2

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from North Richland Hills
5.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.0
State political climate
Texas legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
3.3% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,871 rent vs county FMR
6.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from North Richland Hills
6.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from North Richland Hills
7.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from North Richland Hills
4.8

How North Richland Hills compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
North Richland Hills risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 2.22.2This tracttract 113216North Richland Hil: 2.12.1North Richland Hilparent cityCounty: 3.33.3Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.93.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 32

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 1,845Total filings over 17 yrs
  • 9.33%Avg annual filing rate
  • 16.5%Peak (2007)
  • 110Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2001 to 2017
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 484391132162001: 43 filings (4.74/100 renter HHs)2002: 52 filings (5.73/100 renter HHs)2003: 43 filings (4.74/100 renter HHs)2004: 56 filings (6.17/100 renter HHs)2005: 134 filings (11.56/100 renter HHs)2006: 136 filings (11.73/100 renter HHs)2007: 191 filings (16.48/100 renter HHs)2008: 173 filings (14.93/100 renter HHs)2009: 178 filings (15.36/100 renter HHs)2010: 138 filings (10.55/100 renter HHs)2011: 164 filings (12.72/100 renter HHs)2012: 100 filings (7.76/100 renter HHs)2013: 76 filings (5.90/100 renter HHs)2014: 117 filings (9.08/100 renter HHs)2015: 66 filings (5.12/100 renter HHs)2016: 68 filings (6.15/100 renter HHs)2017: 110 filings (9.95/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 156% over the past 17 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 472Total filings 2020-21
  • 6.1Avg monthly (observed)
  • 4.8Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 1.27×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 11 filings (1.22× baseline)2020-02-01: 6 filings (0.67× baseline)2020-03-01: 7 filings (1.08× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 2 filings (4.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 4 filings (1.60× baseline)2020-09-01: 2 filings (0.44× baseline)2020-10-01: 2 filings (0.33× baseline)2020-11-01: 2 filings (0.44× baseline)2020-12-01: 4 filings (0.80× baseline)2021-01-01: 3 filings (0.33× baseline)2021-02-01: 1 filings (0.11× baseline)2021-03-01: 4 filings (0.62× baseline)2021-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 1 filings (0.13× baseline)2021-07-01: 2 filings (4.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 1 filings (0.40× baseline)2021-09-01: 4 filings (0.89× baseline)2021-10-01: 5 filings (0.83× baseline)2021-11-01: 2 filings (0.44× baseline)2021-12-01: 2 filings (0.40× baseline)2022-01-01: 12 filings (1.33× baseline)2022-02-01: 15 filings (1.67× baseline)2022-03-01: 8 filings (1.23× baseline)2022-04-01: 7 filings (3.50× baseline)2022-05-01: 21 filings (4.20× baseline)2022-06-01: 12 filings (1.60× baseline)2022-07-01: 20 filings (40.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 6 filings (2.40× baseline)2022-09-01: 13 filings (2.89× baseline)2022-10-01: 15 filings (2.50× baseline)2022-11-01: 8 filings (1.78× baseline)2022-12-01: 5 filings (1.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 6 filings (0.67× baseline)2023-02-01: 8 filings (0.89× baseline)2023-03-01: 3 filings (0.46× baseline)2023-04-01: 8 filings (4.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 8 filings (1.60× baseline)2023-06-01: 8 filings (1.07× baseline)2023-07-01: 7 filings (14.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 8 filings (3.20× baseline)2023-09-01: 1 filings (0.22× baseline)2023-10-01: 4 filings (0.67× baseline)2023-11-01: 6 filings (1.33× baseline)2023-12-01: 5 filings (1.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 7 filings (0.78× baseline)2024-02-01: 7 filings (0.78× baseline)2024-03-01: 4 filings (0.62× baseline)2024-04-01: 12 filings (6.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 13 filings (2.60× baseline)2024-06-01: 5 filings (0.67× baseline)2024-07-01: 10 filings (20.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 8 filings (3.20× baseline)2024-09-01: 5 filings (1.11× baseline)2024-10-01: 4 filings (0.67× baseline)2024-11-01: 5 filings (1.11× baseline)2024-12-01: 7 filings (1.40× baseline)2025-01-01: 5 filings (0.56× baseline)2025-02-01: 6 filings (0.67× baseline)2025-03-01: 4 filings (0.62× baseline)2025-04-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 8 filings (1.60× baseline)2025-06-01: 10 filings (1.33× baseline)2025-07-01: 11 filings (22.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 11 filings (4.40× baseline)2025-09-01: 9 filings (2.00× baseline)2025-10-01: 11 filings (1.83× baseline)2025-11-01: 5 filings (1.11× baseline)2025-12-01: 4 filings (0.80× baseline)2026-01-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 9 filings (90.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran near baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Fort Worth, TX as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in North Richland Hills

What moves this score most is tenant organizing strength at 7.5/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from North Richland Hills eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Tarrant County average of 5.1 and above the Texas statewide average of 4.9. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

During 2020 and 2021, eviction filings here ran at about 1.27x the pre-COVID monthly baseline, roughly back to the pre-pandemic baseline.

The tract is White and Hispanic or Latino and ranks around the 32nd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 48439113216

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 48439113216?

Census tract 48439113216 in North Richland Hills scores 2.2/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 48439113216?

Median gross rent is $1,871/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 48% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 48439113216?

3.3% of residents in tract 48439113216 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,101.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 48439113216?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 32th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 28th, household 20th, minority 62th, housing 48th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 48439113216?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 1,845 eviction filings across 17 validated years in tract 48439113216 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 9.33% of renter households, peaking at 16.5% in 2007. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

Did eviction filings in tract 48439113216 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 1.27× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings returned near baseline. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Fort Worth eviction risk, TX), 2020-2021.
Q7

How does tract 48439113216 compare to North Richland Hills overall?

Tract 48439113216 scores 2.2/10, right in line with the parent city of North Richland Hills at 2.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from North Richland Hills eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in North Richland Hills

Top eight tracts in North Richland Hills ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related