Tucson Eviction Risk: Lower

The clearest offset is economic stress at 1/10. Well under the midpoint, rent-regulation exposure reads 1.5/10. On the high side, court filing pressure reads 8.4/10.

The voucher gap is 19.5%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears. Food insecurity runs 8.2% against 17.8% nationally.

SNAP participation runs 5.7% against 15.2% nationally. It sits 0.9 points below the Pima County average of 3.9.

The filing record is not thin: 122 evictions over 12 years of observation. Filings peaked in 2006 at 8.7% of renter households.

In a typical year about 4.3% of renter households face a filing. On the national scale it lands near the 20th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.

Only 14% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 2.1/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the least pressured.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.